Wydział Ekonomiczny - Economics (S1)
specjalność: Property Valuation and Real Estate Transactions
Sylabus przedmiotu Industrial Safety Training:
Informacje podstawowe
| Kierunek studiów | Economics | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forma studiów | studia stacjonarne | Poziom | pierwszego stopnia |
| Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta | licencjat | ||
| Obszary studiów | charakterystyki PRK | ||
| Profil | ogólnoakademicki | ||
| Moduł | — | ||
| Przedmiot | Industrial Safety Training | ||
| Specjalność | przedmiot wspólny | ||
| Jednostka prowadząca | Katedra Nieruchomości | ||
| Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny | Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka <monika.spiewak-szyjka@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| Inni nauczyciele | |||
| ECTS (planowane) | 1,0 | ECTS (formy) | 1,0 |
| Forma zaliczenia | zaliczenie | Język | polski |
| Blok obieralny | — | Grupa obieralna | — |
Wymagania wstępne
| KOD | Wymaganie wstępne |
|---|---|
| W-1 | The subject is of a basic, introductory nature, does not require any initial information. |
Cele przedmiotu
| KOD | Cel modułu/przedmiotu |
|---|---|
| C-1 | Obtaining basic knowledge on occupational health and safety necessary to manage people in the work of an economist. |
| C-2 | The ability to identify potentially dangerous, harmful or arduous factors and their elimination or limiting the effects. |
| C-3 | Ability to organize safe working conditions. |
Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć
| KOD | Treść programowa | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| wykłady | ||
| T-W-1 | Introductory issues. Basic legal regulations in the field of occupational health and safety. Institutions for the supervision of working conditions. | 1 |
| T-W-2 | Basic duties of the employer and employee in the scope of occupational safety and health. | 1 |
| T-W-3 | Selected dangerous, harmful and onerous factors. Characteristics of hazards, measurement and prevention. | 3 |
| T-W-4 | Basic concepts related to risk in the workplace. Occupational risk assessment by the chosen method. | 2 |
| T-W-5 | Employer's obligations in the scope of occupational health and safety trainings, periodic and control examinations. Prevention and hygiene in the workplace. | 2 |
| T-W-6 | Personal protective equipment - protective clothing and work clothes. | 1 |
| 10 | ||
Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności
| KOD | Forma aktywności | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| wykłady | ||
| A-W-1 | Participation in classes | 10 |
| A-W-2 | Preparation for passing the subject | 10 |
| A-W-3 | Reading materials and textbooks | 7 |
| A-W-4 | Preparation for discussion as part of classes on problem issues | 3 |
| 30 | ||
Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne
| KOD | Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne |
|---|---|
| M-1 | Feeding methods (description, anecdote, explanation). |
| M-2 | Problem and activation methods (conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion). |
| M-3 | Exposing methods (film, exhibition). |
| M-4 | Practical methods (demonstration). |
Sposoby oceny
| KOD | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|
| S-1 | Ocena formująca: Discussion and discussion of case studies during a seminar lecture. Student's activity is rewarded with the possibility of raising the final grade, subject to obtaining a positive final pass. |
| S-2 | Ocena podsumowująca: Single choice test or work according to the given formula (in the scope of occupational risk assessment) - one of the two forms of the final pass is given to students in the first class. |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E_1A_A10_W01 Has knowledge of the safe and hygienic mode of functioning in the workplace. He knows the regulations applicable to the employer and employee in the field of health and safety. Is able to identify key hazardous or harmful factors and assess their impact on employee safety. | E_1A_W05, E_1A_W08, E_1A_W09, E_1A_W10 | — | C-3, C-1, C-2 | T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-2, T-W-1, T-W-5, T-W-6 | M-3, M-1, M-2, M-4 | S-2, S-1 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E_1A_A10_U01 Is able to organize safe and hygienic working conditions and react to emerging threats. Has the ability to organize safe work. | E_1A_U03, E_1A_U08, E_1A_U10, E_1A_U18, E_1A_U21 | — | C-3, C-1, C-2 | T-W-2, T-W-5, T-W-6 | M-2, M-4 | S-2, S-1 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E_1A_A10_K01 Is aware of legal and real consequences resulting from ignorance or acting against the recommendations of Occupational Safety and Health. | E_1A_K03, E_1A_K05, E_1A_K06 | — | C-3, C-1, C-2 | T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-2, T-W-5, T-W-6 | M-2, M-4 | S-1 |
Kryterium oceny - wiedza
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| E_1A_A10_W01 Has knowledge of the safe and hygienic mode of functioning in the workplace. He knows the regulations applicable to the employer and employee in the field of health and safety. Is able to identify key hazardous or harmful factors and assess their impact on employee safety. | 2,0 | The student is not able to: - define basic concepts of the subject, - indicate what is the subject literature and what is the goal, subject and the most important issues within the program, - formulate a short (even incomplete) but correct statement for the majority of the subject areas discussed in the classes. The student receives an unsatisfactory grade if he / she does not show interest in the program content or evades the activity and his / her absence does not guarantee that the material arrears. |
| 3,0 | Student, for a satisfactory grade: - in the field of knowledge he mastered and absorbed the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in the range of attitudes towards knowledge, the average interested (partially indifferent), - in the field of expressing knowledge, she commits many minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements is largely incorrect). | |
| 3,5 | Student, a satisfactory plus rating: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in terms of the ratio to the knowledge transferred, the average interest remains, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he makes minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements partly incorrect). | |
| 4,0 | Student, for a good grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered almost all programming material and knowledge acquired the basic content of the program almost exactly, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he almost completely mastered the entire scope of the material, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge, it shows interest, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he commits slight deficiencies (statements have slight errors). | |
| 4,5 | Student, for a good plus grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the program material, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he mastered all program content, properly explains their meaning - shows interest in relation to knowledge, - speaks without difficulty using the substantive vocabulary. | |
| 5,0 | Student, for very good grade: - in terms of knowledge, it goes beyond the curriculum material, - demonstrates the understanding of knowledge without reservations to the course of reasoning, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a lot of interest and cognitive curiosity, can propose a context in which knowledge finds or can find practical application, - speaks a faultless language, properly substantive. |
Kryterium oceny - umiejętności
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| E_1A_A10_U01 Is able to organize safe and hygienic working conditions and react to emerging threats. Has the ability to organize safe work. | 2,0 | He can't identify and cope alone with the difficulties that may arise in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He can not apply practically acquired knowledge, he has basic problems with interpretation and inference. |
| 3,0 | Student is able to identify and deal with a sufficient grade (with the help of a teacher or with the support of third parties) with selected difficulties related to the application of the acquired knowledge. He has very limited ability to put knowledge into practice and makes mistakes in non-primary tasks. | |
| 3,5 | The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus can identify and deal with, provided that additional support is obtained, with difficulties associated with the use of acquired knowledge. Has limited ability to apply knowledge in practice and makes mistakes in tasks in more difficult tasks. | |
| 4,0 | The student, on the good mark can identify and independently deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. Without errors, he applies the acquired knowledge to solve simple and medium-difficult tasks, makes mistakes in interpretation and inferring in more difficult contexts. | |
| 4,5 | The student, on the assessment of a good plus can independently identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He skilfully interprets and concludes in most contexts and tasks before him, understands the sense of mistakes and has the ability to improve. | |
| 5,0 | Student, on the very good assessment, independently identifies and solves the difficulties associated with the process of applying knowledge in practice. Flawlessly interprets and concludes, regardless of the level of difficulty of the issues in the subject matter. Expands your skills by combining the knowledge and skills you have previously acquired and searching for optimal solutions. |
Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| E_1A_A10_K01 Is aware of legal and real consequences resulting from ignorance or acting against the recommendations of Occupational Safety and Health. | 2,0 | The student has no basic knowledge of the subject, which prevents him from showing competence. He presents wrong views and opinions, even in the situation of hints, he can not present competences in correct inference and interpretation skills. It reveals the lack of commitment and the lack of willingness to do the job in a proper way. |
| 3,0 | The student, on the satisfactory grade, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, with numerous errors not fully qualifying. | |
| 3,5 | The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus shows skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, is able to plan the performance of the work and reveals the ability to complete the basic scope of the plan. He makes mistakes, but he usually carries out key areas correctly. | |
| 4,0 | The student, on the good mark, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the subject matter and the basic skills for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills. | |
| 4,5 | Student, good plus: Presents opinions and views demonstrating the meaning of the key subject of the subject and the possibilities and abilities for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills. | |
| 5,0 | The student, on the very good note, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of subject matter and the possibilities and the ability to use the acquired knowledge and skills in the future. |
Literatura podstawowa
- Rączkowski B., BHP w praktyce, Ośrodek Doradztwa i Doskonalenia Kadr, Gdansk, 2007
- Bielec J.:, www.ergonomia.zut.edu.pl, WEk. ZUT w Szczecinie, Internet, Szczecin, 2011, Strona internetowa z materiałami dydaktycznymi dla studentów.
Literatura dodatkowa
- red. Kordacka D., Nauka o pracy – bezpieczeństwo, higiena, ergonomia, Wyd. Centralny Instytut Ochrony Prac, Warszawa, 2000
- Szlązak J., Szlązak N., Bezpieczeństwo i Higiena Pracy, AGH, Kraków, 2005
- red. Danuta Koradecka, Bezpieczeństwo pracy i ergonomia, Wyd. CIOP-PIB, Warszawa, 1997
- Dz. U. Nr 169, poz. 1650, Obwieszczenie Ministra Gospodarki, Pracy i Polityki Społecznej w sprawie ogłoszenia jednolitego tekstu zepisów bezpieczeństwa i higieny pracy, -, -, 2003
- Dz. U. Nr 135, poz. 1516, Rozporządzenie Ministra Edukacji Narodowej i Sportu w sprawie warunków i sposobu organizowania przez publiczne przedszkola, szkoły i placówki krajoznawstwa i turystyki., -, -, 2001