Wydział Ekonomiczny - Economics 28.09.2023 transfer (S1)
specjalność: Accounting and Finance in Economic Entities
Sylabus przedmiotu Analysis and Planning Methods:
Informacje podstawowe
| Kierunek studiów | Economics 28.09.2023 transfer | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forma studiów | studia stacjonarne | Poziom | pierwszego stopnia |
| Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta | licencjat | ||
| Obszary studiów | charakterystyki PRK | ||
| Profil | ogólnoakademicki | ||
| Moduł | — | ||
| Przedmiot | Analysis and Planning Methods | ||
| Specjalność | przedmiot wspólny | ||
| Jednostka prowadząca | Katedra Analizy Systemowej i Marketingu | ||
| Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny | Grażyna Karmowska <Grazyna.Karmowska@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| Inni nauczyciele | |||
| ECTS (planowane) | 3,0 | ECTS (formy) | 3,0 |
| Forma zaliczenia | egzamin | Język | polski |
| Blok obieralny | — | Grupa obieralna | — |
Formy dydaktyczne
Wymagania wstępne
| KOD | Wymaganie wstępne |
|---|---|
| W-1 | The student should know the basics of microeconomics and the basics of business management |
Cele przedmiotu
| KOD | Cel modułu/przedmiotu |
|---|---|
| C-1 | Familiarize students with the methods of supporting decision-making processes and the ability to use them |
| C-2 | Shaping the ability to choose a particular analysis method depending on the conditions |
Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć
| KOD | Treść programowa | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| ćwiczenia audytoryjne | ||
| T-A-1 | Basic principles of analysis and planning. Analysis of decision-making under uncertainty and risk. | 2 |
| T-A-2 | Decision making under uncertainty | 2 |
| T-A-3 | Decision making under risk | 2 |
| T-A-4 | Written test | 2 |
| T-A-5 | Network Programming - problem solving CPM methods. | 2 |
| T-A-6 | PERT methods | 2 |
| T-A-7 | Time and cost analysis | 2 |
| T-A-8 | Written test | 2 |
| T-A-9 | Inventory models | 2 |
| T-A-10 | Queuing systems | 2 |
| T-A-11 | Models of renewal | 2 |
| T-A-12 | Written test | 2 |
| T-A-13 | AHP method | 1 |
| 25 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| T-W-1 | Analysis of decision-making under uncertainty and risk | 2 |
| T-W-2 | Solving problems with the use of network programming | 4 |
| T-W-3 | Analytical models of queuing systems | 2 |
| T-W-4 | Analysis of inventory problems | 2 |
| T-W-5 | Transport problem | 2 |
| T-W-6 | Methods of multi-criteria planning | 3 |
| 15 | ||
Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności
| KOD | Forma aktywności | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| ćwiczenia audytoryjne | ||
| A-A-1 | Preparing for exercises | 10 |
| A-A-2 | Preparing for the test of exercises | 15 |
| A-A-3 | Participation in classes | 25 |
| 50 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| A-W-1 | Participation in lectures | 15 |
| A-W-2 | Getting to know the literature of the subject | 4 |
| A-W-3 | Preparing to pass a written | 4 |
| A-W-4 | Exam | 2 |
| 25 | ||
Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne
| KOD | Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne |
|---|---|
| M-1 | Method of giving / Information lecture |
| M-2 | Method problem / Problem lecture |
| M-3 | Activation method / Case method |
| M-4 | Practical method / Auditory exercises |
Sposoby oceny
| KOD | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|
| S-1 | Ocena podsumowująca: Written exam from lectures in the form of test |
| S-2 | Ocena podsumowująca: Written exam from practice: tasks to be solved |
| S-3 | Ocena formująca: Rating activity participation in student activities, involving the preparation of a topic discussed in class |
Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - wiedza
| Zamierzone efekty kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ec_1A_C16_W01 The student has knowledge about methods supporting the process of making managerial decisions | Ec_1A_W07, Ec_1A_W12 | — | C-1 | T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-5, T-W-6 | M-1, M-2 | S-1 |
| Ec_1A_C16_W02 Student is able to characterize the assumptions of methods supporting the decision-making process | Ec_1A_W01, Ec_1A_W06 | — | C-1 | T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-5 | M-1, M-2 | S-1 |
Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - umiejętności
| Zamierzone efekty kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ec_1A_C16_U01 The student analyzes the causes of the course of economic phenomena and their impact on the decisions made | Ec_1A_U08 | — | C-2 | T-A-2, T-A-3, T-A-6, T-A-7, T-A-9, T-A-10, T-A-11 | M-4, M-3 | S-2 |
| Ec_1A_C16_U02 The student has the ability to use theoretical knowledge in the decision making process | Ec_1A_U02 | — | C-2 | T-A-2, T-A-3, T-A-6, T-A-7, T-A-10, T-A-9, T-A-11 | M-4, M-3 | S-2, S-3 |
| Ec_1A_C16_U03 The student has the ability to select and use the appropriate method depending on the situation | Ec_1A_U04, Ec_1A_U11 | — | C-2 | T-A-2, T-A-3, T-A-6, T-A-7, T-A-11, T-A-10, T-A-9 | M-4, M-3 | S-2, S-3 |
Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Zamierzone efekty kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ec_1A_C16_K01 The student acquires the ability to use the methods in the analysis and planning in the enterprise | Ec_1A_K01, Ec_1A_K02 | — | C-1, C-2 | T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-6 | M-1, M-4, M-3 | S-1, S-2 |
Kryterium oceny - wiedza
| Efekt kształcenia | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| Ec_1A_C16_W01 The student has knowledge about methods supporting the process of making managerial decisions | 2,0 | Student doesn't have basic knowledge about methods supporting management decision making. He obtained less than 60% of points from the test |
| 3,0 | Student has a basic knowledge of methods supporting management decision making. He obtained 60-67% of points from the test. | |
| 3,5 | Student has a basic knowledge of the methods supporting management decision making and partly wrongly chooses the method depending on the circumstances. He obtained 68-75% of points from the test | |
| 4,0 | Student has good knowledge about methods supporting management decision making. He obtained 76-83% of points from the test | |
| 4,5 | Student has a very good knowledge of methods supporting management decision making processes and is able to choose the right method depending on the circumstances. He obtained 84-91% of points from the test | |
| 5,0 | Student has excellent knowledge of methods supporting managerial decision-making processes and can faultlessly choose the right method depending on the circumstances. He obtained at least 92% of points from the test | |
| Ec_1A_C16_W02 Student is able to characterize the assumptions of methods supporting the decision-making process | 2,0 | Student he cann't characterize assumptions for methods supporting the decision making process. He obtained less than 60% of points from the test |
| 3,0 | Student is able to characterize the assumptions for methods supporting the decision-making process to a sufficient extent. He obtained 60-67% of points from the test. | |
| 3,5 | Student can characterize the assumptions for methods supporting the decision making process to a degree more than sufficient. He obtained 68-75% of points from the test | |
| 4,0 | Student can characterize the assumptions for methods supporting the decision-making process in a good degree. He obtained 76-83% of points from the test | |
| 4,5 | Student can characterize the assumptions for methods supporting the decision making process to a degree more than good. He obtained 84-91% of points from the test | |
| 5,0 | Student can characterize the assumptions for methods supporting the decision-making process to a very good degree. He obtained at least 92% of points from the test |
Kryterium oceny - umiejętności
| Efekt kształcenia | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| Ec_1A_C16_U01 The student analyzes the causes of the course of economic phenomena and their impact on the decisions made | 2,0 | The student doesn't think in an entrepreneurial way |
| 3,0 | The student thinks and acts in an entrepreneurial way to a sufficient degree | |
| 3,5 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than enough | |
| 4,0 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a good degree | |
| 4,5 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than good | |
| 5,0 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a very good degree | |
| Ec_1A_C16_U02 The student has the ability to use theoretical knowledge in the decision making process | 2,0 | The student doesn't think in an entrepreneurial way |
| 3,0 | The student thinks and acts in an entrepreneurial way to a sufficient degree | |
| 3,5 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than enough | |
| 4,0 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a good degree | |
| 4,5 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than good | |
| 5,0 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a very good degree | |
| Ec_1A_C16_U03 The student has the ability to select and use the appropriate method depending on the situation | 2,0 | The student doesn't think in an entrepreneurial way |
| 3,0 | The student thinks and acts in an entrepreneurial way to a sufficient degree | |
| 3,5 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than enough | |
| 4,0 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a good degree | |
| 4,5 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than good | |
| 5,0 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a very good degree |
Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Efekt kształcenia | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| Ec_1A_C16_K01 The student acquires the ability to use the methods in the analysis and planning in the enterprise | 2,0 | The student doesn't think in an entrepreneurial way |
| 3,0 | The student thinks and acts in an entrepreneurial way to a sufficient degree | |
| 3,5 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than enough | |
| 4,0 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a good degree | |
| 4,5 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than good | |
| 5,0 | The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a very good degree |
Literatura podstawowa
- T. Ichiischi, A. Neyman, Y. Tauman, Game Theory and Applications, Academic Press, Inc., London, New York, Boston, Sydney, San Diego, Tokyo, 2014, https://books.google.pl/books?hl=en&lr=&id=JD2jBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=game+theory+and+applications+in+economic&ots=JqrC39CM-N&sig=IkzneXI_omuAbQ1V6OMQEktdpnI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=game%20theory%20and%20applications%20in%20economic&f=false
- Lau R.R., Models of Decision-Making, Oxford University Press, 2003, http://www.uky.edu/AS/PoliSci/Peffley/pdf/Lau.%20Models%20of%20Decision-Making.pdf
- Fang Z., Liu S., Shi H., Lin Y., Grey Game Theory and Its Applications in Econimic Decision_Making, Auerbach Publications, New York, 2016, https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9781420087406/grey-game-theory-applications-economic-decision-making-zhigeng-fang-sifeng-liu-hongxing-shi-yi-lin
Literatura dodatkowa
- Karmowska G., Marciniak M., Evaluation of innovation economies of the Central and Eastern Europe compared to other EU countries., Quantitative Methods in Economic Research, Warszawa, 2017, Z 1, T 18, s. 48-57
- Hiller F.S., Liberman J.S., Introduction to Operations Research, Mc Graw-Hill International Edition, 2009