Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie

Wydział Ekonomiczny - Economics 28.09.2023 transfer (S1)
specjalność: Accounting and Finance in Economic Entities

Sylabus przedmiotu Industrial safety training:

Informacje podstawowe

Kierunek studiów Economics 28.09.2023 transfer
Forma studiów studia stacjonarne Poziom pierwszego stopnia
Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta licencjat
Obszary studiów charakterystyki PRK
Profil ogólnoakademicki
Moduł
Przedmiot Industrial safety training
Specjalność przedmiot wspólny
Jednostka prowadząca Katedra Nieruchomości
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka <monika.spiewak-szyjka@zut.edu.pl>
Inni nauczyciele
ECTS (planowane) 1,0 ECTS (formy) 1,0
Forma zaliczenia zaliczenie Język polski
Blok obieralny Grupa obieralna

Formy dydaktyczne

Forma dydaktycznaKODSemestrGodzinyECTSWagaZaliczenie
wykładyW1 15 1,01,00zaliczenie

Wymagania wstępne

KODWymaganie wstępne
W-1The subject is of a basic, introductory nature, does not require any initial information.

Cele przedmiotu

KODCel modułu/przedmiotu
C-1Obtaining basic knowledge on occupational health and safety necessary to manage people in the work of an economist.
C-2The ability to identify potentially dangerous, harmful or arduous factors and their elimination or limiting the effects.
C-3Ability to organize safe working conditions.

Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć

KODTreść programowaGodziny
wykłady
T-W-1Introductory issues. Basic legal regulations in the field of occupational health and safety. Institutions for the supervision of working conditions.2
T-W-2Basic duties of the employer and employee in the scope of occupational safety and health.2
T-W-3Selected dangerous, harmful and onerous factors. Characteristics of hazards, measurement and prevention.3
T-W-4Basic concepts related to risk in the workplace. Occupational risk assessment by the chosen method.3
T-W-5Employer's obligations in the scope of occupational health and safety trainings, periodic and control examinations. Prevention and hygiene in the workplace.2
T-W-6Personal protective equipment - protective clothing and work clothes.2
T-W-7Test1
15

Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
wykłady
A-W-1Participation in classes15
A-W-2Preparation for passing the subject5
A-W-3Reading materials and textbooks3
A-W-4Preparation for discussion as part of classes on problem issues2
25

Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne

KODMetoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne
M-1Feeding methods (description, anecdote, explanation).
M-2Problem and activation methods (conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
M-3Exposing methods (film, exhibition).
M-4Practical methods (demonstration).

Sposoby oceny

KODSposób oceny
S-1Ocena formująca: Discussion and discussion of case studies during a seminar lecture. Student's activity is rewarded with the possibility of raising the final grade, subject to obtaining a positive final pass.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Test

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - wiedza

Zamierzone efekty kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
Ec_1A_A01_W01
Knows and understands health and safety regulations.
Ec_1A_W05C-1, C-2, C-3T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-5, T-W-6M-1, M-2, M-3, M-4S-1, S-2

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - umiejętności

Zamierzone efekty kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
Ec_1A_A01_U01
The student is able to identify hazards and propose solutions in accordance with knowledge, law or standards, in terms of health and safety.
Ec_1A_U09C-1, C-2, C-3T-W-2, T-W-5, T-W-6M-2, M-4S-1, S-2

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Zamierzone efekty kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
Ec_1A_A01_K01
The student is ready to take responsibility for his/her own work and that of others, in the context of safety and the formation of hygienic working (and learning) conditions.
Ec_1A_K04C-1, C-2, C-3T-W-2, T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-5, T-W-6M-2, M-4S-1

Kryterium oceny - wiedza

Efekt kształceniaOcenaKryterium oceny
Ec_1A_A01_W01
Knows and understands health and safety regulations.
2,0The student is not able to: - define basic concepts of the subject, - indicate what is the subject literature and what is the goal, subject and the most important issues within the program, - formulate a short (even incomplete) but correct statement for the majority of the subject areas discussed in the classes. The student receives an unsatisfactory grade if he / she does not show interest in the program content or evades the activity and his / her absence does not guarantee that the material arrears.
3,0Student, for a satisfactory grade: - in the field of knowledge he mastered and absorbed the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in the range of attitudes towards knowledge, the average interested (partially indifferent), - in the field of expressing knowledge, she commits many minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements is largely incorrect).
3,5Student, a satisfactory plus rating: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in terms of the ratio to the knowledge transferred, the average interest remains, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he makes minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements partly incorrect).
4,0Student, for a good grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered almost all programming material and knowledge acquired the basic content of the program almost exactly, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he almost completely mastered the entire scope of the material, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge, it shows interest, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he commits slight deficiencies (statements have slight errors).
4,5Student, for a good plus grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the program material, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he mastered all program content, properly explains their meaning - shows interest in relation to knowledge, - speaks without difficulty using the substantive vocabulary.
5,0Student, for very good grade: - in terms of knowledge, it goes beyond the curriculum material, - demonstrates the understanding of knowledge without reservations to the course of reasoning, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a lot of interest and cognitive curiosity, can propose a context in which knowledge finds or can find practical application, - speaks a faultless language, properly substantive.

Kryterium oceny - umiejętności

Efekt kształceniaOcenaKryterium oceny
Ec_1A_A01_U01
The student is able to identify hazards and propose solutions in accordance with knowledge, law or standards, in terms of health and safety.
2,0He can't identify and cope alone with the difficulties that may arise in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He can not apply practically acquired knowledge, he has basic problems with interpretation and inference.
3,0Student is able to identify and deal with a sufficient grade (with the help of a teacher or with the support of third parties) with selected difficulties related to the application of the acquired knowledge. He has very limited ability to put knowledge into practice and makes mistakes in non-primary tasks.
3,5The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus can identify and deal with, provided that additional support is obtained, with difficulties associated with the use of acquired knowledge. Has limited ability to apply knowledge in practice and makes mistakes in tasks in more difficult tasks.
4,0The student, on the good mark can identify and independently deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. Without errors, he applies the acquired knowledge to solve simple and medium-difficult tasks, makes mistakes in interpretation and inferring in more difficult contexts.
4,5The student, on the assessment of a good plus can independently identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He skilfully interprets and concludes in most contexts and tasks before him, understands the sense of mistakes and has the ability to improve.
5,0Student, on the very good assessment, independently identifies and solves the difficulties associated with the process of applying knowledge in practice. Flawlessly interprets and concludes, regardless of the level of difficulty of the issues in the subject matter. Expands your skills by combining the knowledge and skills you have previously acquired and searching for optimal solutions.

Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Efekt kształceniaOcenaKryterium oceny
Ec_1A_A01_K01
The student is ready to take responsibility for his/her own work and that of others, in the context of safety and the formation of hygienic working (and learning) conditions.
2,0The student has no basic knowledge of the subject, which prevents him from showing competence. He presents wrong views and opinions, even in the situation of hints, he can not present competences in correct inference and interpretation skills. It reveals the lack of commitment and the lack of willingness to do the job in a proper way.
3,0The student, on the satisfactory grade, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, with numerous errors not fully qualifying.
3,5The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus shows skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, is able to plan the performance of the work and reveals the ability to complete the basic scope of the plan. He makes mistakes, but he usually carries out key areas correctly.
4,0The student, on the good mark, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the subject matter and the basic skills for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
4,5Student, good plus: Presents opinions and views demonstrating the meaning of the key subject of the subject and the possibilities and abilities for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
5,0The student, on the very good note, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of subject matter and the possibilities and the ability to use the acquired knowledge and skills in the future.

Literatura podstawowa

  1. Rączkowski B., BHP w praktyce, Ośrodek Doradztwa i Doskonalenia Kadr, Gdansk, 2020, ISBN: 9788378047179
  2. Rączkowski B, Szkolenie wstępne BHP - instruktaż ogólny, ODDK, Gdańsk, 2016, ISBN: 9788378046523

Literatura dodatkowa

  1. Żołyński J., Praca w warunkach stwarzających zagrożenie dla życia lub zdrowia pracownika, ODDK Spółka z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością Spółka Komandytowa, Gdańsk, 2021

Treści programowe - wykłady

KODTreść programowaGodziny
T-W-1Introductory issues. Basic legal regulations in the field of occupational health and safety. Institutions for the supervision of working conditions.2
T-W-2Basic duties of the employer and employee in the scope of occupational safety and health.2
T-W-3Selected dangerous, harmful and onerous factors. Characteristics of hazards, measurement and prevention.3
T-W-4Basic concepts related to risk in the workplace. Occupational risk assessment by the chosen method.3
T-W-5Employer's obligations in the scope of occupational health and safety trainings, periodic and control examinations. Prevention and hygiene in the workplace.2
T-W-6Personal protective equipment - protective clothing and work clothes.2
T-W-7Test1
15

Formy aktywności - wykłady

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
A-W-1Participation in classes15
A-W-2Preparation for passing the subject5
A-W-3Reading materials and textbooks3
A-W-4Preparation for discussion as part of classes on problem issues2
25
(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaEc_1A_A01_W01Knows and understands health and safety regulations.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_W05He / she knows and understands at an advanced level the role of man as an entity creating and operating in socio-economic institutions, as well as managing them, types of social ties, their impact on the economy and the regularities governing them
Cel przedmiotuC-1Obtaining basic knowledge on occupational health and safety necessary to manage people in the work of an economist.
C-2The ability to identify potentially dangerous, harmful or arduous factors and their elimination or limiting the effects.
C-3Ability to organize safe working conditions.
Treści programoweT-W-1Introductory issues. Basic legal regulations in the field of occupational health and safety. Institutions for the supervision of working conditions.
T-W-2Basic duties of the employer and employee in the scope of occupational safety and health.
T-W-3Selected dangerous, harmful and onerous factors. Characteristics of hazards, measurement and prevention.
T-W-4Basic concepts related to risk in the workplace. Occupational risk assessment by the chosen method.
T-W-5Employer's obligations in the scope of occupational health and safety trainings, periodic and control examinations. Prevention and hygiene in the workplace.
T-W-6Personal protective equipment - protective clothing and work clothes.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Feeding methods (description, anecdote, explanation).
M-2Problem and activation methods (conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
M-3Exposing methods (film, exhibition).
M-4Practical methods (demonstration).
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Discussion and discussion of case studies during a seminar lecture. Student's activity is rewarded with the possibility of raising the final grade, subject to obtaining a positive final pass.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Test
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0The student is not able to: - define basic concepts of the subject, - indicate what is the subject literature and what is the goal, subject and the most important issues within the program, - formulate a short (even incomplete) but correct statement for the majority of the subject areas discussed in the classes. The student receives an unsatisfactory grade if he / she does not show interest in the program content or evades the activity and his / her absence does not guarantee that the material arrears.
3,0Student, for a satisfactory grade: - in the field of knowledge he mastered and absorbed the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in the range of attitudes towards knowledge, the average interested (partially indifferent), - in the field of expressing knowledge, she commits many minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements is largely incorrect).
3,5Student, a satisfactory plus rating: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in terms of the ratio to the knowledge transferred, the average interest remains, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he makes minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements partly incorrect).
4,0Student, for a good grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered almost all programming material and knowledge acquired the basic content of the program almost exactly, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he almost completely mastered the entire scope of the material, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge, it shows interest, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he commits slight deficiencies (statements have slight errors).
4,5Student, for a good plus grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the program material, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he mastered all program content, properly explains their meaning - shows interest in relation to knowledge, - speaks without difficulty using the substantive vocabulary.
5,0Student, for very good grade: - in terms of knowledge, it goes beyond the curriculum material, - demonstrates the understanding of knowledge without reservations to the course of reasoning, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a lot of interest and cognitive curiosity, can propose a context in which knowledge finds or can find practical application, - speaks a faultless language, properly substantive.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaEc_1A_A01_U01The student is able to identify hazards and propose solutions in accordance with knowledge, law or standards, in terms of health and safety.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_U09He / she is able to plan and organise individual work and cooperate with other people as part of team activities
Cel przedmiotuC-1Obtaining basic knowledge on occupational health and safety necessary to manage people in the work of an economist.
C-2The ability to identify potentially dangerous, harmful or arduous factors and their elimination or limiting the effects.
C-3Ability to organize safe working conditions.
Treści programoweT-W-2Basic duties of the employer and employee in the scope of occupational safety and health.
T-W-5Employer's obligations in the scope of occupational health and safety trainings, periodic and control examinations. Prevention and hygiene in the workplace.
T-W-6Personal protective equipment - protective clothing and work clothes.
Metody nauczaniaM-2Problem and activation methods (conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
M-4Practical methods (demonstration).
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Discussion and discussion of case studies during a seminar lecture. Student's activity is rewarded with the possibility of raising the final grade, subject to obtaining a positive final pass.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Test
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0He can't identify and cope alone with the difficulties that may arise in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He can not apply practically acquired knowledge, he has basic problems with interpretation and inference.
3,0Student is able to identify and deal with a sufficient grade (with the help of a teacher or with the support of third parties) with selected difficulties related to the application of the acquired knowledge. He has very limited ability to put knowledge into practice and makes mistakes in non-primary tasks.
3,5The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus can identify and deal with, provided that additional support is obtained, with difficulties associated with the use of acquired knowledge. Has limited ability to apply knowledge in practice and makes mistakes in tasks in more difficult tasks.
4,0The student, on the good mark can identify and independently deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. Without errors, he applies the acquired knowledge to solve simple and medium-difficult tasks, makes mistakes in interpretation and inferring in more difficult contexts.
4,5The student, on the assessment of a good plus can independently identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He skilfully interprets and concludes in most contexts and tasks before him, understands the sense of mistakes and has the ability to improve.
5,0Student, on the very good assessment, independently identifies and solves the difficulties associated with the process of applying knowledge in practice. Flawlessly interprets and concludes, regardless of the level of difficulty of the issues in the subject matter. Expands your skills by combining the knowledge and skills you have previously acquired and searching for optimal solutions.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaEc_1A_A01_K01The student is ready to take responsibility for his/her own work and that of others, in the context of safety and the formation of hygienic working (and learning) conditions.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_K04He / she is ready to take social, professional and ethical responsibility for the performed professional roles and to demand it from others, and to care for the achievements and traditions of the profession
Cel przedmiotuC-1Obtaining basic knowledge on occupational health and safety necessary to manage people in the work of an economist.
C-2The ability to identify potentially dangerous, harmful or arduous factors and their elimination or limiting the effects.
C-3Ability to organize safe working conditions.
Treści programoweT-W-2Basic duties of the employer and employee in the scope of occupational safety and health.
T-W-3Selected dangerous, harmful and onerous factors. Characteristics of hazards, measurement and prevention.
T-W-4Basic concepts related to risk in the workplace. Occupational risk assessment by the chosen method.
T-W-5Employer's obligations in the scope of occupational health and safety trainings, periodic and control examinations. Prevention and hygiene in the workplace.
T-W-6Personal protective equipment - protective clothing and work clothes.
Metody nauczaniaM-2Problem and activation methods (conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
M-4Practical methods (demonstration).
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Discussion and discussion of case studies during a seminar lecture. Student's activity is rewarded with the possibility of raising the final grade, subject to obtaining a positive final pass.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0The student has no basic knowledge of the subject, which prevents him from showing competence. He presents wrong views and opinions, even in the situation of hints, he can not present competences in correct inference and interpretation skills. It reveals the lack of commitment and the lack of willingness to do the job in a proper way.
3,0The student, on the satisfactory grade, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, with numerous errors not fully qualifying.
3,5The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus shows skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, is able to plan the performance of the work and reveals the ability to complete the basic scope of the plan. He makes mistakes, but he usually carries out key areas correctly.
4,0The student, on the good mark, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the subject matter and the basic skills for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
4,5Student, good plus: Presents opinions and views demonstrating the meaning of the key subject of the subject and the possibilities and abilities for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
5,0The student, on the very good note, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of subject matter and the possibilities and the ability to use the acquired knowledge and skills in the future.