Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie

Wydział Ekonomiczny - Economics 28.09.2023 transfer (S1)

Sylabus przedmiotu Methodology of scientific research:

Informacje podstawowe

Kierunek studiów Economics 28.09.2023 transfer
Forma studiów studia stacjonarne Poziom pierwszego stopnia
Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta licencjat
Obszary studiów charakterystyki PRK
Profil ogólnoakademicki
Moduł
Przedmiot Methodology of scientific research
Specjalność przedmiot wspólny
Jednostka prowadząca Katedra Ekonomii, Finansów i Rachunkowości
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny Aleksandra Grzesiuk <agrzesiuk@zut.edu.pl>
Inni nauczyciele Aleksandra Grzesiuk <agrzesiuk@zut.edu.pl>
ECTS (planowane) 1,0 ECTS (formy) 1,0
Forma zaliczenia zaliczenie Język polski
Blok obieralny Grupa obieralna

Formy dydaktyczne

Forma dydaktycznaKODSemestrGodzinyECTSWagaZaliczenie
konwersatoriaK4 15 1,01,00zaliczenie

Wymagania wstępne

KODWymaganie wstępne
W-1Basic knowledge of human cognitive processes at the high school level.

Cele przedmiotu

KODCel modułu/przedmiotu
C-1As a result of the organized learning process, the student will: - have elementary knowledge related to the methodological determinants of creative work,
C-2A student knows elementary issues concerning the specifics of promotional work preparation,
C-3A student is able to solve the standard problems occurring during the creation of a promotional work
C-4After completing the course, a student understands the need to protect intellectual property

Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć

KODTreść programowaGodziny
konwersatoria
T-K-1Features of economics as a science. Methodology of scientific research - definition issues, place in the system of sciences. The basic requirements for dissertation.5
T-K-2Characteristics of the basic methodical elements of the dissertations. Procedure for solving research problems. Basic errors of utterances and names8
T-K-3Characteristics of the basic elements and techniques of the research process - final test2
15

Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
konwersatoria
A-K-1student's own work including: - preparation for current seminars (selection and analysis of literature adequate to particular topics of the classes, preparation of tasks commissioned by the teacher), - prepare for credit10
A-K-2Participation in classes and in final test15
25

Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne

KODMetoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne
M-1Problem-related methods - conversational lecture.
M-2Feeding methods - Socratic or heuristic talk.
M-3Activating methods - didactic discussion.
M-4Practical methods - solving tasks indicated by the teacher.
M-5Problem-related methods - conversational lecture, heuristic talk
M-6Practical methods - solving tasks indicated by the teacher (subject exercises)

Sposoby oceny

KODSposób oceny
S-1Ocena formująca: Forming assessment: Evaluation of activity at classes expressed, among others, by participation in a didactic discussion, a Sokratic or heuristic talk. At the same time, the teacher's control is subject to: -the culture of utterance, -declaration of presented arguments, -tolerance towards counterarguments, -the perception of thematic relations, -the language of expression
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Summative assessment: Assessment of written assignments.
S-3Ocena podsumowująca: Summative assessment: Evaluation of the multiple choice test.
S-4Ocena formująca: Formative assessment: for the oral statement: - understanding of the command, - the degree of exhaustion of the topic, - composition of expression, - indivisibility, - expression of the utterance (way of justifying theses), -orality of expression
S-5Ocena formująca: Forming assessment: for practical work: - understanding of the command, - planning the work, - way of execution and its quality, - material consumption, - material saving, - indivisibility, - time of execution;
S-6Ocena formująca: Forming assessment: for team work: - work plan (uniformity of assigned tasks), - originality of ideas, work concept, - quality of performance, - deadline, - team cooperation, - work presentation
S-7Ocena formująca: Forming assessment: for the student's activity: - setting important questions, - giving answers about the subject, - giving a new thought, - developing someone's thoughts, - making a synthesis of information
S-8Ocena formująca: for student motivation; - participation in discussion/group works etc, - initiation of action (the student not only adapts to the didactic situation but organizes it in a certain way - spontaneously starts a given type of activity)
S-9Ocena podsumowująca: Summative assessment: evaluation of the test

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - wiedza

Zamierzone efekty kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
Ec_1A_A06_W01
A student knows and understands the basic concepts in the field of research methodology.
Ec_1A_W03, Ec_1A_W02C-2T-K-1, T-K-2, T-K-3M-5, M-6S-4, S-5, S-7, S-9, S-8
Ec_1A_A06_W02
A student knows and understands the procedure of research applied in social sciences.
Ec_1A_W03C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4T-K-1, T-K-2, T-K-3M-1, M-2, M-6S-1, S-3, S-7, S-9, S-2
Ec_1A_A06_W03
A student knows and understands the process of preparation of the dissertation and its methodological elements.
Ec_1A_W03C-2, C-3T-K-1, T-K-2, T-K-3M-5, M-6S-4, S-5, S-6, S-7, S-9, S-8

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - umiejętności

Zamierzone efekty kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
Ec_1A_A06_U01
A student is able to solve elementary problems that occur when creating a promotional work.
Ec_1A_U02, Ec_1A_U01C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4T-K-1, T-K-2, T-K-3M-6S-4, S-5, S-6, S-7, S-9, S-8

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Zamierzone efekty kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
Ec_1A_A06_K01
A student is ready to adhere to the ethical principles of scientific writing.
Ec_1A_K04C-4T-K-1, T-K-2, T-K-3M-5, M-6S-7, S-8

Kryterium oceny - wiedza

Efekt kształceniaOcenaKryterium oceny
Ec_1A_A06_W01
A student knows and understands the basic concepts in the field of research methodology.
2,0Student is not able to: - define basic concepts in the field of scientific research methodology, - indicate what is the subject literature and subject matter and what does not constitute it, - indicate the basic elements of methodical work, - distinguish, define and use sources virtual knowledge, -exter what is involved and from what stages consists of the procedure for solving research problems, -change and characterize the basic research methods for gathering actual knowledge in economics.
3,0student: - in the scope of knowledge, he mastered the basic program material, - mastered the basic scope of material in terms of knowledge, - absorbed basic program content in terms of knowledge acquisition, in terms of attitudes towards knowledge, average (partially indifferent) knowledge, - in the field of expression Knowledge makes many minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements is largely incorrect)..
3,5Student: - in the scope of knowledge, he mastered the basic program material, - mastered the basic scope of material, - acquired knowledge of basic program content in terms of knowledge acquisition, - medium interest in the range of attitudes towards knowledge, - minor errors in the field of knowledge expression in the content and language (the quality of the statements is partially wrong).
4,0Student: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered almost all of the program material, - he almost completely mastered the scope of material in terms of knowledge, - acquired the basic program content almost exactly in terms of knowledge acquisition, - shows interest in the range of attitudes to knowledge - the field of expressing knowledge commits slight deficiencies (statements generally correct - slight linguistic errors)
4,5Student: - in the scope of knowledge, he mastered all the program material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered all program content, - in terms of attitude to knowledge shows a lot of interest, - in the field of expressing knowledge and how to respond - without difficulty
5,0Student: - in the field of knowledge, he goes beyond the curriculum, - in the scope of understanding knowledge - without reservations, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a lot of interest and cognitive curiosity, - he speaks flawless language, correctly and confidently
Ec_1A_A06_W02
A student knows and understands the procedure of research applied in social sciences.
2,0Student does not have elementary knowledge about the procedure of research applied in social sciences (economics).
3,0Student has elementary knowledge about the procedure of research applied in social sciences (economics).
3,5The student has a basic knowledge of the procedure of research applied in social sciences (economics).
4,0Student: - in the scope of knowledge, he mastered the basic program material, - he mastered the basic scope of material in terms of knowledge, - acquired the basic contents of the knowledge acquisition, - in the range of attitudes to knowledge, the average interested, - in the field of expressing knowledge, minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements is partially wrong).
4,5Student: - in the scope of knowledge, he mastered all the program material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge, he mastered all program content, - in terms of attitude to knowledge
5,0Student: - in the field of knowledge goes beyond the curriculum, - in terms of understanding knowledge - without reservations, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a large interest and cognitive curiosity, - speaks flawless language, correctly and confidently
Ec_1A_A06_W03
A student knows and understands the process of preparation of the dissertation and its methodological elements.
2,0Student does not have elementary knowledge about the process of preparation of the dissertation and its methodological elements
3,0Student has elementary knowledge about the process of preparation of the promotional work and its methodological elements.
3,5Student: - in the scope of knowledge, he mastered the basic program material, - mastered the basic scope of material, - acquired knowledge of basic program content in terms of knowledge acquisition, - medium interest in the range of attitudes towards knowledge, - minor errors in the field of knowledge expression in the content and language (the quality of the statements is partially wrong).
4,0Student: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered almost all of the program material, - he almost completely mastered the scope of material in terms of knowledge, - acquired the basic program content almost exactly in terms of knowledge acquisition, - shows interest in the range of attitudes to knowledge - the field of expressing knowledge commits slight deficiencies (statements generally correct - slight linguistic errors)
4,5Student: - in the scope of knowledge, he mastered all the program material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered all program content, - in terms of attitude to knowledge shows a lot of interest, - in the field of expressing knowledge and how to respond - without difficulty
5,0Student: - in the scope of knowledge, it goes beyond the curriculum, - in the scope of understanding knowledge - without reservations, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a lot of interest and cognitive curiosity, - he/she speaks flawless language, correctly and confidently

Kryterium oceny - umiejętności

Efekt kształceniaOcenaKryterium oceny
Ec_1A_A06_U01
A student is able to solve elementary problems that occur when creating a promotional work.
2,0Student can not identify and cope independently with the difficulties that may appear at each stage of creating a promotional work, he does not use contextual knowledge.
3,0Student is able to identify and deal with the teacher's substantial help with selected difficulties related to the process of preparing a promotional work.
3,5Is able to identify and deal with the help of a teacher with selected difficulties related to the process of preparing a promotional work.
4,0Is able to identify and deal independently with the basic difficulties associated with the process of preparing a dissertation
4,5Is able to independently identify and deal with the basic difficulties associated with the process of preparation of own research project.
5,0Is able to independently identify and deal with the advanced difficulties associated with the process of preparation of own research project.

Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Efekt kształceniaOcenaKryterium oceny
Ec_1A_A06_K01
A student is ready to adhere to the ethical principles of scientific writing.
2,0Student does not show any interest or desire to learn elementary knowledge of ethical principles - presenting opinions and opinions proving that it is in a preconventional stage of moral development.
3,0Student presents views and opinions that testify to the elementary interest in the ethical attitude in scientific work (the stage of conventional moral development - the first subphase).
3,5Presents views and opinions that show willingness to follow the rules of scientific writing (the stage of conventional moran development - second subphase).
4,0Student presents views and opinions characteristic of the post-conventional stage of moral development.
4,5Presents views and opinions that show moral laws being guided in their conduct.
5,0Presents views and opinions that show moral laws being guided in their conduct.

Literatura podstawowa

  1. Blaug Mark, The Methodology of Economics: Or, How Economists Explain, Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature, Cambridge, 1983, 1st ed. or 2nd ed. - 1992
  2. Lakatos Imre, Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2020
  3. Pruzan Peter, Research Methodology, Springer-Verlag GmbH, 2016
  4. Brewer D.D., Essentials of Scientific Research, Evidence Guides, 2020

Literatura dodatkowa

  1. Patil Shridhar, Research Methodology in SOcial Sciences, New India Publishing Agency, 2020
  2. Ketchen David J. Jr., Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, Emerald Publishing, 2004

Treści programowe - konwersatoria

KODTreść programowaGodziny
T-K-1Features of economics as a science. Methodology of scientific research - definition issues, place in the system of sciences. The basic requirements for dissertation.5
T-K-2Characteristics of the basic methodical elements of the dissertations. Procedure for solving research problems. Basic errors of utterances and names8
T-K-3Characteristics of the basic elements and techniques of the research process - final test2
15

Formy aktywności - konwersatoria

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
A-K-1student's own work including: - preparation for current seminars (selection and analysis of literature adequate to particular topics of the classes, preparation of tasks commissioned by the teacher), - prepare for credit10
A-K-2Participation in classes and in final test15
25
(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaEc_1A_A06_W01A student knows and understands the basic concepts in the field of research methodology.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_W03He / she knows and understands the research methodology in the field of economics and finance at an advanced level
Ec_1A_W02He / she knows and understands at an advanced level the place of economics and finance in the system of social sciences and the links with other scientific disciplines
Cel przedmiotuC-2A student knows elementary issues concerning the specifics of promotional work preparation,
Treści programoweT-K-1Features of economics as a science. Methodology of scientific research - definition issues, place in the system of sciences. The basic requirements for dissertation.
T-K-2Characteristics of the basic methodical elements of the dissertations. Procedure for solving research problems. Basic errors of utterances and names
T-K-3Characteristics of the basic elements and techniques of the research process - final test
Metody nauczaniaM-5Problem-related methods - conversational lecture, heuristic talk
M-6Practical methods - solving tasks indicated by the teacher (subject exercises)
Sposób ocenyS-4Ocena formująca: Formative assessment: for the oral statement: - understanding of the command, - the degree of exhaustion of the topic, - composition of expression, - indivisibility, - expression of the utterance (way of justifying theses), -orality of expression
S-5Ocena formująca: Forming assessment: for practical work: - understanding of the command, - planning the work, - way of execution and its quality, - material consumption, - material saving, - indivisibility, - time of execution;
S-7Ocena formująca: Forming assessment: for the student's activity: - setting important questions, - giving answers about the subject, - giving a new thought, - developing someone's thoughts, - making a synthesis of information
S-9Ocena podsumowująca: Summative assessment: evaluation of the test
S-8Ocena formująca: for student motivation; - participation in discussion/group works etc, - initiation of action (the student not only adapts to the didactic situation but organizes it in a certain way - spontaneously starts a given type of activity)
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Student is not able to: - define basic concepts in the field of scientific research methodology, - indicate what is the subject literature and subject matter and what does not constitute it, - indicate the basic elements of methodical work, - distinguish, define and use sources virtual knowledge, -exter what is involved and from what stages consists of the procedure for solving research problems, -change and characterize the basic research methods for gathering actual knowledge in economics.
3,0student: - in the scope of knowledge, he mastered the basic program material, - mastered the basic scope of material in terms of knowledge, - absorbed basic program content in terms of knowledge acquisition, in terms of attitudes towards knowledge, average (partially indifferent) knowledge, - in the field of expression Knowledge makes many minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements is largely incorrect)..
3,5Student: - in the scope of knowledge, he mastered the basic program material, - mastered the basic scope of material, - acquired knowledge of basic program content in terms of knowledge acquisition, - medium interest in the range of attitudes towards knowledge, - minor errors in the field of knowledge expression in the content and language (the quality of the statements is partially wrong).
4,0Student: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered almost all of the program material, - he almost completely mastered the scope of material in terms of knowledge, - acquired the basic program content almost exactly in terms of knowledge acquisition, - shows interest in the range of attitudes to knowledge - the field of expressing knowledge commits slight deficiencies (statements generally correct - slight linguistic errors)
4,5Student: - in the scope of knowledge, he mastered all the program material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered all program content, - in terms of attitude to knowledge shows a lot of interest, - in the field of expressing knowledge and how to respond - without difficulty
5,0Student: - in the field of knowledge, he goes beyond the curriculum, - in the scope of understanding knowledge - without reservations, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a lot of interest and cognitive curiosity, - he speaks flawless language, correctly and confidently
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaEc_1A_A06_W02A student knows and understands the procedure of research applied in social sciences.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_W03He / she knows and understands the research methodology in the field of economics and finance at an advanced level
Cel przedmiotuC-1As a result of the organized learning process, the student will: - have elementary knowledge related to the methodological determinants of creative work,
C-2A student knows elementary issues concerning the specifics of promotional work preparation,
C-3A student is able to solve the standard problems occurring during the creation of a promotional work
C-4After completing the course, a student understands the need to protect intellectual property
Treści programoweT-K-1Features of economics as a science. Methodology of scientific research - definition issues, place in the system of sciences. The basic requirements for dissertation.
T-K-2Characteristics of the basic methodical elements of the dissertations. Procedure for solving research problems. Basic errors of utterances and names
T-K-3Characteristics of the basic elements and techniques of the research process - final test
Metody nauczaniaM-1Problem-related methods - conversational lecture.
M-2Feeding methods - Socratic or heuristic talk.
M-6Practical methods - solving tasks indicated by the teacher (subject exercises)
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Forming assessment: Evaluation of activity at classes expressed, among others, by participation in a didactic discussion, a Sokratic or heuristic talk. At the same time, the teacher's control is subject to: -the culture of utterance, -declaration of presented arguments, -tolerance towards counterarguments, -the perception of thematic relations, -the language of expression
S-3Ocena podsumowująca: Summative assessment: Evaluation of the multiple choice test.
S-7Ocena formująca: Forming assessment: for the student's activity: - setting important questions, - giving answers about the subject, - giving a new thought, - developing someone's thoughts, - making a synthesis of information
S-9Ocena podsumowująca: Summative assessment: evaluation of the test
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Summative assessment: Assessment of written assignments.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Student does not have elementary knowledge about the procedure of research applied in social sciences (economics).
3,0Student has elementary knowledge about the procedure of research applied in social sciences (economics).
3,5The student has a basic knowledge of the procedure of research applied in social sciences (economics).
4,0Student: - in the scope of knowledge, he mastered the basic program material, - he mastered the basic scope of material in terms of knowledge, - acquired the basic contents of the knowledge acquisition, - in the range of attitudes to knowledge, the average interested, - in the field of expressing knowledge, minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements is partially wrong).
4,5Student: - in the scope of knowledge, he mastered all the program material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge, he mastered all program content, - in terms of attitude to knowledge
5,0Student: - in the field of knowledge goes beyond the curriculum, - in terms of understanding knowledge - without reservations, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a large interest and cognitive curiosity, - speaks flawless language, correctly and confidently
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaEc_1A_A06_W03A student knows and understands the process of preparation of the dissertation and its methodological elements.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_W03He / she knows and understands the research methodology in the field of economics and finance at an advanced level
Cel przedmiotuC-2A student knows elementary issues concerning the specifics of promotional work preparation,
C-3A student is able to solve the standard problems occurring during the creation of a promotional work
Treści programoweT-K-1Features of economics as a science. Methodology of scientific research - definition issues, place in the system of sciences. The basic requirements for dissertation.
T-K-2Characteristics of the basic methodical elements of the dissertations. Procedure for solving research problems. Basic errors of utterances and names
T-K-3Characteristics of the basic elements and techniques of the research process - final test
Metody nauczaniaM-5Problem-related methods - conversational lecture, heuristic talk
M-6Practical methods - solving tasks indicated by the teacher (subject exercises)
Sposób ocenyS-4Ocena formująca: Formative assessment: for the oral statement: - understanding of the command, - the degree of exhaustion of the topic, - composition of expression, - indivisibility, - expression of the utterance (way of justifying theses), -orality of expression
S-5Ocena formująca: Forming assessment: for practical work: - understanding of the command, - planning the work, - way of execution and its quality, - material consumption, - material saving, - indivisibility, - time of execution;
S-6Ocena formująca: Forming assessment: for team work: - work plan (uniformity of assigned tasks), - originality of ideas, work concept, - quality of performance, - deadline, - team cooperation, - work presentation
S-7Ocena formująca: Forming assessment: for the student's activity: - setting important questions, - giving answers about the subject, - giving a new thought, - developing someone's thoughts, - making a synthesis of information
S-9Ocena podsumowująca: Summative assessment: evaluation of the test
S-8Ocena formująca: for student motivation; - participation in discussion/group works etc, - initiation of action (the student not only adapts to the didactic situation but organizes it in a certain way - spontaneously starts a given type of activity)
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Student does not have elementary knowledge about the process of preparation of the dissertation and its methodological elements
3,0Student has elementary knowledge about the process of preparation of the promotional work and its methodological elements.
3,5Student: - in the scope of knowledge, he mastered the basic program material, - mastered the basic scope of material, - acquired knowledge of basic program content in terms of knowledge acquisition, - medium interest in the range of attitudes towards knowledge, - minor errors in the field of knowledge expression in the content and language (the quality of the statements is partially wrong).
4,0Student: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered almost all of the program material, - he almost completely mastered the scope of material in terms of knowledge, - acquired the basic program content almost exactly in terms of knowledge acquisition, - shows interest in the range of attitudes to knowledge - the field of expressing knowledge commits slight deficiencies (statements generally correct - slight linguistic errors)
4,5Student: - in the scope of knowledge, he mastered all the program material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered all program content, - in terms of attitude to knowledge shows a lot of interest, - in the field of expressing knowledge and how to respond - without difficulty
5,0Student: - in the scope of knowledge, it goes beyond the curriculum, - in the scope of understanding knowledge - without reservations, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a lot of interest and cognitive curiosity, - he/she speaks flawless language, correctly and confidently
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaEc_1A_A06_U01A student is able to solve elementary problems that occur when creating a promotional work.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_U02He / she can apply knowledge to formulate and solve complex and unusual problems concerning socio-economic processes and phenomena in the micro-, meso- and macro-scale
Ec_1A_U01He / she can use knowledge to identify and interpret socio-economic processes and phenomena with the use of methods and tools appropriate for economics
Cel przedmiotuC-1As a result of the organized learning process, the student will: - have elementary knowledge related to the methodological determinants of creative work,
C-2A student knows elementary issues concerning the specifics of promotional work preparation,
C-3A student is able to solve the standard problems occurring during the creation of a promotional work
C-4After completing the course, a student understands the need to protect intellectual property
Treści programoweT-K-1Features of economics as a science. Methodology of scientific research - definition issues, place in the system of sciences. The basic requirements for dissertation.
T-K-2Characteristics of the basic methodical elements of the dissertations. Procedure for solving research problems. Basic errors of utterances and names
T-K-3Characteristics of the basic elements and techniques of the research process - final test
Metody nauczaniaM-6Practical methods - solving tasks indicated by the teacher (subject exercises)
Sposób ocenyS-4Ocena formująca: Formative assessment: for the oral statement: - understanding of the command, - the degree of exhaustion of the topic, - composition of expression, - indivisibility, - expression of the utterance (way of justifying theses), -orality of expression
S-5Ocena formująca: Forming assessment: for practical work: - understanding of the command, - planning the work, - way of execution and its quality, - material consumption, - material saving, - indivisibility, - time of execution;
S-6Ocena formująca: Forming assessment: for team work: - work plan (uniformity of assigned tasks), - originality of ideas, work concept, - quality of performance, - deadline, - team cooperation, - work presentation
S-7Ocena formująca: Forming assessment: for the student's activity: - setting important questions, - giving answers about the subject, - giving a new thought, - developing someone's thoughts, - making a synthesis of information
S-9Ocena podsumowująca: Summative assessment: evaluation of the test
S-8Ocena formująca: for student motivation; - participation in discussion/group works etc, - initiation of action (the student not only adapts to the didactic situation but organizes it in a certain way - spontaneously starts a given type of activity)
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Student can not identify and cope independently with the difficulties that may appear at each stage of creating a promotional work, he does not use contextual knowledge.
3,0Student is able to identify and deal with the teacher's substantial help with selected difficulties related to the process of preparing a promotional work.
3,5Is able to identify and deal with the help of a teacher with selected difficulties related to the process of preparing a promotional work.
4,0Is able to identify and deal independently with the basic difficulties associated with the process of preparing a dissertation
4,5Is able to independently identify and deal with the basic difficulties associated with the process of preparation of own research project.
5,0Is able to independently identify and deal with the advanced difficulties associated with the process of preparation of own research project.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaEc_1A_A06_K01A student is ready to adhere to the ethical principles of scientific writing.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_K04He / she is ready to take social, professional and ethical responsibility for the performed professional roles and to demand it from others, and to care for the achievements and traditions of the profession
Cel przedmiotuC-4After completing the course, a student understands the need to protect intellectual property
Treści programoweT-K-1Features of economics as a science. Methodology of scientific research - definition issues, place in the system of sciences. The basic requirements for dissertation.
T-K-2Characteristics of the basic methodical elements of the dissertations. Procedure for solving research problems. Basic errors of utterances and names
T-K-3Characteristics of the basic elements and techniques of the research process - final test
Metody nauczaniaM-5Problem-related methods - conversational lecture, heuristic talk
M-6Practical methods - solving tasks indicated by the teacher (subject exercises)
Sposób ocenyS-7Ocena formująca: Forming assessment: for the student's activity: - setting important questions, - giving answers about the subject, - giving a new thought, - developing someone's thoughts, - making a synthesis of information
S-8Ocena formująca: for student motivation; - participation in discussion/group works etc, - initiation of action (the student not only adapts to the didactic situation but organizes it in a certain way - spontaneously starts a given type of activity)
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Student does not show any interest or desire to learn elementary knowledge of ethical principles - presenting opinions and opinions proving that it is in a preconventional stage of moral development.
3,0Student presents views and opinions that testify to the elementary interest in the ethical attitude in scientific work (the stage of conventional moral development - the first subphase).
3,5Presents views and opinions that show willingness to follow the rules of scientific writing (the stage of conventional moran development - second subphase).
4,0Student presents views and opinions characteristic of the post-conventional stage of moral development.
4,5Presents views and opinions that show moral laws being guided in their conduct.
5,0Presents views and opinions that show moral laws being guided in their conduct.