Wydział Ekonomiczny - Economics (S1)
Sylabus przedmiotu Economy and Environment:
Informacje podstawowe
| Kierunek studiów | Economics | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forma studiów | studia stacjonarne | Poziom | pierwszego stopnia |
| Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta | licencjat | ||
| Obszary studiów | charakterystyki PRK | ||
| Profil | ogólnoakademicki | ||
| Moduł | — | ||
| Przedmiot | Economy and Environment | ||
| Specjalność | przedmiot wspólny | ||
| Jednostka prowadząca | Katedra Studiów Regionalnych i Europejskich | ||
| Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny | Bartosz Mickiewicz <Bartosz.Mickiewicz@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| Inni nauczyciele | Milena Bera <Milena.Bera@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| ECTS (planowane) | 3,0 | ECTS (formy) | 3,0 |
| Forma zaliczenia | egzamin | Język | polski |
| Blok obieralny | — | Grupa obieralna | — |
Formy dydaktyczne
Wymagania wstępne
| KOD | Wymaganie wstępne |
|---|---|
| W-1 | The subject is of an introductory nature to the science of economics, it does not require preliminary knowledge. |
Cele przedmiotu
| KOD | Cel modułu/przedmiotu |
|---|---|
| C-1 | To acquaint students with contemporary legal and economic solutions in relation to the environment. |
| C-2 | Developing skills in solving ecological problems as part of sustainable development. |
| C-3 | Preparation and conducting of presentations on the state's ecological policy and detailed solutions at the level of local governments, enterprises and households. |
| C-4 | To acquaint students with the influence of different fields of farming on the environment elements. |
| C-5 | To arouse students' sense of responsibility for the environment. |
Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć
| KOD | Treść programowa | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| ćwiczenia audytoryjne | ||
| T-A-1 | Relation between economics and the environment. Basic concepts in the field of economy and environment. Environmental law. | 2 |
| T-A-2 | Ecological behavior of households. Rational use of environmental resources. | 2 |
| T-A-3 | A detailed review of economic instruments of the state's environmental policy. Examples and scope of their implementation in the economy. | 2 |
| T-A-4 | Selected issues in the field of protection and use of natural resources, eg penalties for illegal logging of trees and shrubs, protection against noise, vibrations and radiation emitted by enterprises, procedures for obtaining permits to use the environment, rules for handling packaging waste. | 3 |
| T-A-5 | Environmental management. ISO 14000, EMAS certification - procedures. | 2 |
| T-A-6 | Municipal economy and the environment. The role of self-government in shaping local environmental management | 2 |
| T-A-7 | Ecological education. Activities of non-governmental organizations involved in environmental protection. | 2 |
| 15 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| T-W-1 | Relation between economics and the environment. Basic concepts in the field of environmental protection. | 2 |
| T-W-2 | Environmental law. The principle of rational management. | 1 |
| T-W-3 | Economic functions of nature. Natural resources. Types of resources and their use in the country's economy. | 1 |
| T-W-4 | Nature protection in Poland. Historical and contemporary forms of nature protection. Natura 2000 areas. | 1 |
| T-W-5 | The ecological policy of the state. Economic instruments of ecological policy and sustainable and sustainable socio-economic development. | 1 |
| T-W-6 | Sozoeconomic account: economics of environmental protection in outline (damage, loss, cost and effect). Methods for the valuation of environmental components. | 1 |
| T-W-7 | Environmental management. Standards ISO 14000, EMAS. | 1 |
| T-W-8 | Enterprise and the environment. Report on the environmental impact of business enterprises as a tool to create an ecological order. | 1 |
| T-W-9 | Impact of agricultural activity on the environment. Food contamination. | 1 |
| 10 | ||
Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności
| KOD | Forma aktywności | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| ćwiczenia audytoryjne | ||
| A-A-1 | Participation in auditorium exercises. | 15 |
| A-A-2 | Preparing for the auditorium classes. | 15 |
| A-A-3 | Preparation for tests. | 5 |
| A-A-4 | Reading the indicated literature. | 15 |
| A-A-5 | Preparing for the colloquium. | 10 |
| 60 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| A-W-1 | Participation in lectures. | 10 |
| A-W-2 | Reading the indicated literature. | 10 |
| A-W-3 | Preparing to pass. | 10 |
| 30 | ||
Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne
| KOD | Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne |
|---|---|
| M-1 | Presenting methods (story, description, anecdote, explanation). |
| M-2 | Problem methods (problem lecture, conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion). |
| M-3 | Programmed methods (using a computer). |
| M-4 | Practical methods (demonstration, subject exercises). |
Sposoby oceny
| KOD | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|
| S-1 | Ocena formująca: Assessment of students' activity during classes. |
| S-2 | Ocena formująca: Assessment of students' knowledge and skills in the form of a test at the beginning of the course. |
| S-3 | Ocena podsumowująca: The test, at the end of the subject, in the form of closed multiple-choice questions on issues discussed in class. |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E_1A_E1_W01 The student knows the basic institutions and tools regulating management consistent with sustainable development. He is aware of ecological principles in a modern economy. | E_1A_W01, E_1A_W02, E_1A_W04, E_1A_W09 | — | C-5 | T-W-1, T-W-2, T-A-2, T-A-7, T-A-4 | M-1, M-2, M-3, M-4 | S-2, S-1 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E_1A_E1_U01 The student can make simple calculations in the area of fees for using the environment (in particular by economic entities). | E_1A_U05 | — | C-2 | T-W-5, T-W-6, T-W-8, T-A-3, T-A-4 | M-3, M-4 | S-2 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E_1A_E1_K01 Preparing and conducting presentations on the country's environmental policy and detailed solutions at the level of local governments, enterprises and households. | E_1A_K01, E_1A_K04 | — | C-3 | T-A-2, T-A-7 | M-4 | S-1 |
Kryterium oceny - wiedza
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| E_1A_E1_W01 The student knows the basic institutions and tools regulating management consistent with sustainable development. He is aware of ecological principles in a modern economy. | 2,0 | The student is not able to: - define basic concepts of the subject, - indicate what is the subject literature and what is the goal, subject and the most important issues within the program, - formulate a short (even incomplete) but correct statement for the majority of the subject areas discussed in the classes. The student receives an unsatisfactory grade if he / she does not show interest in the program content or evades the activity and his / her absence does not guarantee that the material is catching up. |
| 3,0 | Student, for a satisfactory grade: - in the field of knowledge, he mastered and absorbed the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in the range of attitudes towards knowledge, the average interested (partially indifferent), - in the field of expressing knowledge, she commits many minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements is largely incorrect). | |
| 3,5 | Student, a satisfactory plus rating: - in the area of knowledge he mastered the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in terms of the ratio to the knowledge transferred, the average interest remains, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he makes minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements partly incorrect). | |
| 4,0 | Student, for a good grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered almost all programming material and knowledge acquired the basic content of the program almost exactly, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he almost completely mastered the entire scope of the material, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge, it shows interest, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he commits slight deficiencies (statements have slight errors). | |
| 4,5 | Student, for good plus grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the program material, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he mastered all program content, properly explains their meaning - shows interest in relation to knowledge, - speaks without difficulty using the substantive vocabulary. | |
| 5,0 | Student, for very good grade: - in terms of knowledge, it goes beyond the curriculum material, - demonstrates the understanding of knowledge without reservations to the course of reasoning, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a lot of interest and cognitive curiosity, can propose a context in which knowledge finds or can find practical application, - speaks a faultless language, properly substantive. |
Kryterium oceny - umiejętności
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| E_1A_E1_U01 The student can make simple calculations in the area of fees for using the environment (in particular by economic entities). | 2,0 | Lack of ability to solve a simple problem according to given criteria. |
| 3,0 | Student solves problem tasks with numerous errors. | |
| 3,5 | Student correctly solves tasks with individual errors. | |
| 4,0 | The student understands the meaning and correctly solves the tasks, but has problems with the interpretation of the results. | |
| 4,5 | Student properly solves tasks and interprets with minor formal failures. | |
| 5,0 | Student correctly solves tasks, correctly interprets them, can propose practical application of a given problem. |
Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| E_1A_E1_K01 Preparing and conducting presentations on the country's environmental policy and detailed solutions at the level of local governments, enterprises and households. | 2,0 | The student has no basic knowledge of the subject, which prevents him from showing competence. He presents wrong views and opinions, even in the situation of hints, he can not present competences in correct inference and interpretation skills. It reveals the lack of commitment and the lack of willingness to do the job in a proper way. In the field of teamwork, the student is not able to plan and perform the work correctly and on time, does not report the need for assistance in consultations or despite this help does not achieve the minimum standards of performance. |
| 3,0 | The student, on the satisfactory grade, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, with numerous errors not fully qualifying. In the field of team work, the student: plans and performs work in a clumsy way at each of its stages (preparatory, idea and project, executive, pre-presentation control and presentation itself). | |
| 3,5 | The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus shows skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, is able to plan the performance of the work and reveals the ability to complete the basic scope of the plan. He makes mistakes, but he usually carries out key areas correctly. In the field of teamwork, the student: can specify the goals of his own work and distribute or help in the distribution of tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks. The student usually obtains a correct effect. | |
| 4,0 | The student, on the good mark, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the subject matter and the basic skills for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills. In the field of teamwork, the student: can specify the goals of his own work and distribute or help in the distribution of tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks. | |
| 4,5 | The student, on the good grade plus, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the key subject of the subject and the possibilities and abilities for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills. In the field of teamwork, the student: can independently plan, specify goals and actively participate in the distribution of tasks and their implementation at each stage of work. | |
| 5,0 | The student, on the very good note, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of subject matter and the possibilities and the ability to use the acquired knowledge and skills in the future. In the field of teamwork, the student: can independently plan, specify goals and distribute tasks by skills and control the situation of the project through proper motivation to act. The student demonstrates the timeliness and flawless way of presenting the results. |
Literatura podstawowa
- Molly Scott Cato, Environment and Economy, Routledge; 1 edition, 2011, ISBN-13: 978-0415477413
- James K. Boyce, The Political Economy of the Environment, Edward Elgar Publication, 2002, ISBN-13: 978-1840643664
- Michael Jacobs, THE GREEN ECONOMY: Environment, Sustainable Development and the Politics of the Future, Pluto Press; 1st edition, 1992, ISBN-13: 978-0745304120
- Collective works, Polish Yearbook of Environmental Law, Mikolaj Kopernik University in Torun, ISSN 2391-7881 (online), 2016, Edited every year, http://apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/PYEL