Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie

Wydział Ekonomiczny - Economics (S1)

Sylabus przedmiotu Ergonomics:

Informacje podstawowe

Kierunek studiów Economics
Forma studiów studia stacjonarne Poziom pierwszego stopnia
Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta licencjat
Obszary studiów charakterystyki PRK
Profil ogólnoakademicki
Moduł —
Przedmiot Ergonomics
Specjalność przedmiot wspólny
Jednostka prowadząca Katedra Studiów Regionalnych i Europejskich
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny Bartosz Mickiewicz <Bartosz.Mickiewicz@zut.edu.pl>
Inni nauczyciele
ECTS (planowane) 2,0 ECTS (formy) 2,0
Forma zaliczenia zaliczenie Język polski
Blok obieralny 1 Grupa obieralna 1

Formy dydaktyczne

Forma dydaktycznaKODSemestrGodzinyECTSWagaZaliczenie
projektyP3 30 2,01,00zaliczenie

Wymagania wstępne

KODWymaganie wstępne
W-1Selected aspects of knowledge in the field of microeconomics and management.

Cele przedmiotu

KODCel modułu/przedmiotu
C-1Obtaining the basics of knowledge about ergonomics. Mastering basic terms and conceptual categories.
C-2Understanding the process of improving working conditions and improving the organization of workstations as an aspect of effective and modern management. Understanding the relationship between good workplace organization and work efficiency.
C-3The ability to apply the assessment of the biological cost of work. Ability to assess workstations and factors that have a negative impact on work efficiency and knowledge of methods of diagnosing inefficiency of work organization.
C-4he ability to formulate recommendations for improving the diagnosed disability of work organization and ways to reduce their effects.
C-5Having knowledge about employer's obligations and health and safety at work requirements and the ability to combine them with ergonomics recommendations for proper and effective work organization.

Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć

KODTreść programowaGodziny
projekty
T-P-1Subject and scope of ergonomics. Layout: human - technical object - human environment as an object of ergonomics. Ergonomics as multidisciplinary knowledge. Concept and corrective ergonomics. Workplace with a screen monitor, ergonomics of office space.3
T-P-2Outline of knowledge about human work. Types of work.2
T-P-3The biological cost of work. Analysis of the work process. Physical effort at work. Static and dynamic load at work. Physiology of mental effort, its evaluation. Physical and mental fatigue. Monotype and monotony.5
T-P-4Material work environment as an element of the assessment of the biological labor cost: noise, vibration, microclimate, lighting, radiation and other hazards (chemical, biological). Impact on health, work safety and work efficiency. Hazards in the workplace and protection measures.5
T-P-5Organization of working time, breaks at work, shift work. Participation of physiology and occupational medicine in shaping working conditions.2
T-P-6Psychological factors of work organization. Signal perception. Sensory abilities of a human being, relations with the human nervous system. Visual communication (graphic symbols, codes, etc.) and voice.2
T-P-7Psychological stress at work: sources, threats, deficit / excess of information, time deficit.4
T-P-8Areas of interest in modern ergonomics.2
T-P-9Labour protection.2
T-P-10Methods and techniques of ergonomic evaluation of devices. Checklists. Ergonomic analysis for occupational risk assessment in the workplace.3
30

Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
projekty
A-P-1Participation in project classes.30
A-P-2Reading materials and literature on the subject.17
A-P-3Preparation of the final work or preparation for the test.13
60

Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne

KODMetoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne
M-1Explanatory methods (story, description, anecdote, explanation).
M-2Problem methods (problem lecture, conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
M-3Exposing methods (film, exhibition).
M-4Programmed methods (using a computer, with the use of measuring equipment and teaching machines).
M-5Practical methods (demonstration, subject exercises).

Sposoby oceny

KODSposób oceny
S-1Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or project work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a project work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the project work and test grades.

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
E_1A_O1/1_W01
Knowledge of psychophysical features constituting the ability to work.		E_1A_W05—C-1, C-5, C-3, C-2T-P-3, T-P-7, T-P-2, T-P-6, T-P-1M-1, M-2, M-5S-1, S-2
E_1A_O1/1_W02
The student has knowledge of instruments affecting work efficiency.		E_1A_W10—C-4, C-3, C-2T-P-10, T-P-3, T-P-5, T-P-4, T-P-8M-4, M-2, M-5S-1, S-2
E_1A_O1/1_W03
Knowledge in the field of human work as an element of entrepreneurship creation.		E_1A_W15—C-5, C-4T-P-2, T-P-5, T-P-4, T-P-9M-1, M-2S-1, S-2

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
E_1A_O1/1_U01
Human resources management in such a way that at the lowest biological cost achieve the highest efficiency.		E_1A_U03, E_1A_U18—C-1, C-5, C-4, C-3, C-2T-P-3, T-P-4M-1, M-2, M-5S-1, S-2
E_1A_O1/1_U02
The student has the ability to apply standards for shaping the material work environment.		E_1A_U05—C-1, C-5, C-4, C-2T-P-5, T-P-4, T-P-9M-4, M-5S-1, S-2

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
E_1A_O1/1_K01
Awareness of the needs and capabilities of their and subordinate employees influences the increase of managerial and organizational skills.		E_1A_K08—C-1, C-5, C-4, C-3, C-2T-P-3, T-P-7, T-P-2, T-P-5, T-P-6, T-P-8, T-P-1M-3, M-1, M-4, M-2, M-5S-1, S-2
E_1A_O1/1_K02
The student has competence in the humanization of the work process.		E_1A_K07—C-1, C-4, C-3, C-2T-P-3, T-P-7, T-P-5, T-P-4, T-P-6, T-P-8M-4, M-2, M-5S-1, S-2

Kryterium oceny - wiedza

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
E_1A_O1/1_W01
Knowledge of psychophysical features constituting the ability to work.		2,0Failure to pass, pass the project work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
3,0The minimum level of completion of project tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
3,5In general, correctly performed project work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at about 60%.
4,0Well done project work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at about 70%.
4,5Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a project work or a test at the level of about 80%.
5,0Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.
E_1A_O1/1_W02
The student has knowledge of instruments affecting work efficiency.		2,0The student is not able to: - define basic concepts of the subject, - indicate what is the subject literature and what is the goal, subject and the most important issues within the program, - sformułować krótkiej (nawet niepełnej), ale poprawnej wypowiedzi dla większości poruszanych na zajęciach obszarów tematycznych. Student otrzymuje ocenę niedostateczną, jeśli nie wykazuje zainteresowania treściami programowymi lub uchyla się od aktywności a jego absencja nie daje gwarancji nadrobienia zaległości w materialne.
3,0Student, for a satisfactory grade: - in the field of knowledge, he mastered and absorbed the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in the range of attitudes towards knowledge, the average interested (partially indifferent), - in the field of expressing knowledge, she commits many minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements is largely incorrect).
3,5Student, a satisfactory plus rating: - in the area of knowledge he mastered the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in terms of the ratio to the knowledge transferred, the average interest remains, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he makes minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements partly incorrect).
4,0Student, for a good grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered almost all programming material and knowledge acquired the basic content of the program almost exactly, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he almost completely mastered the entire scope of the material, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge, it shows interest, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he commits slight deficiencies (statements have slight errors).
4,5Student, for good plus grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the program material, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he mastered all program content, properly explains their meaning - shows interest in relation to knowledge, - speaks without difficulty using the substantive vocabulary.
5,0Student, for very good grade: - in terms of knowledge, it goes beyond the curriculum material, - demonstrates the understanding of knowledge without reservations to the course of reasoning, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a lot of interest and cognitive curiosity, can propose a context in which knowledge finds or can find practical application, - speaks a faultless language, properly substantive.
E_1A_O1/1_W03
Knowledge in the field of human work as an element of entrepreneurship creation.		2,0Failure to pass, pass the project work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
3,0The minimum level of completion of project tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
3,5In general, correctly performed project work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at about 60%.
4,0Well done project work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at about 70%.
4,5Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a project work or a test at the level of about 80%.
5,0Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.

Kryterium oceny - umiejętności

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
E_1A_O1/1_U01
Human resources management in such a way that at the lowest biological cost achieve the highest efficiency.		2,0Failure to pass, pass the project work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
3,0The minimum level of completion of project tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
3,5In general, correctly performed project work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at the level of approx. 60%.
4,0Well done project work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at the level of about 70%.
4,5Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a project work or a test at the level of about 80%.
5,0Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.
E_1A_O1/1_U02
The student has the ability to apply standards for shaping the material work environment.		2,0The student can not identify and deal with the difficulties that may arise in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He can not apply practically acquired knowledge, he has basic problems with interpretation and inference.
3,0Student is able to identify and deal with a sufficient grade (with the help of a teacher or with the support of third parties) with selected difficulties related to the application of the acquired knowledge. He has very limited ability to put knowledge into practice and makes mistakes in non-primary tasks.
3,5The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus can identify and deal with, provided that additional support is obtained, with difficulties associated with the use of acquired knowledge. Has limited ability to apply knowledge in practice and makes mistakes in tasks in more difficult tasks.
4,0The student, on the good mark can identify and independently deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. Without errors, he applies the acquired knowledge to solve simple and medium-difficult tasks, makes mistakes in interpretation and inferring in more difficult contexts.
4,5The student, on the assessment of a good plus can independently identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He skilfully interprets and concludes in most contexts and tasks before him, understands the sense of mistakes and has the ability to improve.
5,0Student, on the very good assessment, independently identifies and solves the difficulties associated with the process of applying knowledge in practice. Flawlessly interprets and concludes, regardless of the level of difficulty of the issues in the subject matter. Expands your skills by combining the knowledge and skills you have previously acquired and searching for optimal solutions.

Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
E_1A_O1/1_K01
Awareness of the needs and capabilities of their and subordinate employees influences the increase of managerial and organizational skills.		2,0In the field of teamwork, the student is not able to plan and perform the work correctly and on time, does not report the need for assistance in consultations or despite this help does not achieve the minimum standards of performance.
3,0In the field of teamwork, the student plans and performs work in a clumsy way at each of its stages (preparatory, idea and project, executive, pre-presentation control and presentation itself).
3,5In the field of team work, the student is able to specify the goals of his own work and distributes or assists in discharging tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks. The student usually obtains a correct effect.
4,0In the field of team work, the student is able to specify the goals of his own work and distributes or assists in discharging tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks.
4,5In the field of teamwork, the student is able to independently plan, specify goals and actively participate in the distribution of tasks and their implementation at each stage of work.
5,0In the field of teamwork, the student: can independently plan, specify goals and distribute tasks by skills and control the situation of the project through proper motivation to act. The student demonstrates the timeliness and flawless way of presenting the results.
E_1A_O1/1_K02
The student has competence in the humanization of the work process.		2,0Failure to pass, pass the project work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
3,0The minimum level of completion of project tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
3,5In general, correctly performed project work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at about 60%.
4,0Well done project work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at about 70%.
4,5Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a project work or a test at the level of about 80%.
5,0Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.

Literatura podstawowa

  1. Collective work, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Wiley; 4 edition (March 13, 2012), 2012, ISBN-13: 978-0470528389
  2. Neville A Stanton, Human Factors Methods, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2013, ISBN: 1409457540
  3. R.S. Bridger, Introduction to Ergonomics, CRC Press, 2013, ISBN13: 9780849373060
  4. Gavriel Salvendy (Editor), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, John Wiley & Sons, 2006, ISBN13: 9780471449171
  5. https://www.iea.cc/, International Ergonomics Association, Internet, 2019, www site with all problems concerning ergonomics

Treści programowe - projekty

KODTreść programowaGodziny
T-P-1Subject and scope of ergonomics. Layout: human - technical object - human environment as an object of ergonomics. Ergonomics as multidisciplinary knowledge. Concept and corrective ergonomics. Workplace with a screen monitor, ergonomics of office space.3
T-P-2Outline of knowledge about human work. Types of work.2
T-P-3The biological cost of work. Analysis of the work process. Physical effort at work. Static and dynamic load at work. Physiology of mental effort, its evaluation. Physical and mental fatigue. Monotype and monotony.5
T-P-4Material work environment as an element of the assessment of the biological labor cost: noise, vibration, microclimate, lighting, radiation and other hazards (chemical, biological). Impact on health, work safety and work efficiency. Hazards in the workplace and protection measures.5
T-P-5Organization of working time, breaks at work, shift work. Participation of physiology and occupational medicine in shaping working conditions.2
T-P-6Psychological factors of work organization. Signal perception. Sensory abilities of a human being, relations with the human nervous system. Visual communication (graphic symbols, codes, etc.) and voice.2
T-P-7Psychological stress at work: sources, threats, deficit / excess of information, time deficit.4
T-P-8Areas of interest in modern ergonomics.2
T-P-9Labour protection.2
T-P-10Methods and techniques of ergonomic evaluation of devices. Checklists. Ergonomic analysis for occupational risk assessment in the workplace.3
30

Formy aktywności - projekty

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
A-P-1Participation in project classes.30
A-P-2Reading materials and literature on the subject.17
A-P-3Preparation of the final work or preparation for the test.13
60
(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięE_1A_O1/1_W01Knowledge of psychophysical features constituting the ability to work.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówE_1A_W05Ma podstawową wiedzę o człowieku jako podmiocie tworzącym i działającym w strukturach społeczno-gospodarczych oraz zna prawidłowości związane z ich funkcjonowaniem
Cel przedmiotuC-1Obtaining the basics of knowledge about ergonomics. Mastering basic terms and conceptual categories.
C-5Having knowledge about employer's obligations and health and safety at work requirements and the ability to combine them with ergonomics recommendations for proper and effective work organization.
C-3The ability to apply the assessment of the biological cost of work. Ability to assess workstations and factors that have a negative impact on work efficiency and knowledge of methods of diagnosing inefficiency of work organization.
C-2Understanding the process of improving working conditions and improving the organization of workstations as an aspect of effective and modern management. Understanding the relationship between good workplace organization and work efficiency.
Treści programoweT-P-3The biological cost of work. Analysis of the work process. Physical effort at work. Static and dynamic load at work. Physiology of mental effort, its evaluation. Physical and mental fatigue. Monotype and monotony.
T-P-7Psychological stress at work: sources, threats, deficit / excess of information, time deficit.
T-P-2Outline of knowledge about human work. Types of work.
T-P-6Psychological factors of work organization. Signal perception. Sensory abilities of a human being, relations with the human nervous system. Visual communication (graphic symbols, codes, etc.) and voice.
T-P-1Subject and scope of ergonomics. Layout: human - technical object - human environment as an object of ergonomics. Ergonomics as multidisciplinary knowledge. Concept and corrective ergonomics. Workplace with a screen monitor, ergonomics of office space.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Explanatory methods (story, description, anecdote, explanation).
M-2Problem methods (problem lecture, conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
M-5Practical methods (demonstration, subject exercises).
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or project work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a project work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the project work and test grades.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Failure to pass, pass the project work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
3,0The minimum level of completion of project tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
3,5In general, correctly performed project work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at about 60%.
4,0Well done project work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at about 70%.
4,5Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a project work or a test at the level of about 80%.
5,0Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięE_1A_O1/1_W02The student has knowledge of instruments affecting work efficiency.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówE_1A_W10Zna podstawowe koncepcje i metody zarządzania procesami gospodarczymi i kapitałem ludzkim, rozumie powiązania między obszarami i funkcjami zarządzania w podmiotach społeczno-gospodarczych
Cel przedmiotuC-4he ability to formulate recommendations for improving the diagnosed disability of work organization and ways to reduce their effects.
C-3The ability to apply the assessment of the biological cost of work. Ability to assess workstations and factors that have a negative impact on work efficiency and knowledge of methods of diagnosing inefficiency of work organization.
C-2Understanding the process of improving working conditions and improving the organization of workstations as an aspect of effective and modern management. Understanding the relationship between good workplace organization and work efficiency.
Treści programoweT-P-10Methods and techniques of ergonomic evaluation of devices. Checklists. Ergonomic analysis for occupational risk assessment in the workplace.
T-P-3The biological cost of work. Analysis of the work process. Physical effort at work. Static and dynamic load at work. Physiology of mental effort, its evaluation. Physical and mental fatigue. Monotype and monotony.
T-P-5Organization of working time, breaks at work, shift work. Participation of physiology and occupational medicine in shaping working conditions.
T-P-4Material work environment as an element of the assessment of the biological labor cost: noise, vibration, microclimate, lighting, radiation and other hazards (chemical, biological). Impact on health, work safety and work efficiency. Hazards in the workplace and protection measures.
T-P-8Areas of interest in modern ergonomics.
Metody nauczaniaM-4Programmed methods (using a computer, with the use of measuring equipment and teaching machines).
M-2Problem methods (problem lecture, conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
M-5Practical methods (demonstration, subject exercises).
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or project work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a project work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the project work and test grades.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0The student is not able to: - define basic concepts of the subject, - indicate what is the subject literature and what is the goal, subject and the most important issues within the program, - sformułować krótkiej (nawet niepełnej), ale poprawnej wypowiedzi dla większości poruszanych na zajęciach obszarów tematycznych. Student otrzymuje ocenę niedostateczną, jeśli nie wykazuje zainteresowania treściami programowymi lub uchyla się od aktywności a jego absencja nie daje gwarancji nadrobienia zaległości w materialne.
3,0Student, for a satisfactory grade: - in the field of knowledge, he mastered and absorbed the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in the range of attitudes towards knowledge, the average interested (partially indifferent), - in the field of expressing knowledge, she commits many minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements is largely incorrect).
3,5Student, a satisfactory plus rating: - in the area of knowledge he mastered the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in terms of the ratio to the knowledge transferred, the average interest remains, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he makes minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements partly incorrect).
4,0Student, for a good grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered almost all programming material and knowledge acquired the basic content of the program almost exactly, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he almost completely mastered the entire scope of the material, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge, it shows interest, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he commits slight deficiencies (statements have slight errors).
4,5Student, for good plus grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the program material, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he mastered all program content, properly explains their meaning - shows interest in relation to knowledge, - speaks without difficulty using the substantive vocabulary.
5,0Student, for very good grade: - in terms of knowledge, it goes beyond the curriculum material, - demonstrates the understanding of knowledge without reservations to the course of reasoning, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a lot of interest and cognitive curiosity, can propose a context in which knowledge finds or can find practical application, - speaks a faultless language, properly substantive.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięE_1A_O1/1_W03Knowledge in the field of human work as an element of entrepreneurship creation.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówE_1A_W15Zna ogólne zasady tworzenia i rozwoju form indywidualnej przedsiębiorczości wykorzystującej wiedzę z zakresu ekonomii
Cel przedmiotuC-5Having knowledge about employer's obligations and health and safety at work requirements and the ability to combine them with ergonomics recommendations for proper and effective work organization.
C-4he ability to formulate recommendations for improving the diagnosed disability of work organization and ways to reduce their effects.
Treści programoweT-P-2Outline of knowledge about human work. Types of work.
T-P-5Organization of working time, breaks at work, shift work. Participation of physiology and occupational medicine in shaping working conditions.
T-P-4Material work environment as an element of the assessment of the biological labor cost: noise, vibration, microclimate, lighting, radiation and other hazards (chemical, biological). Impact on health, work safety and work efficiency. Hazards in the workplace and protection measures.
T-P-9Labour protection.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Explanatory methods (story, description, anecdote, explanation).
M-2Problem methods (problem lecture, conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or project work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a project work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the project work and test grades.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Failure to pass, pass the project work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
3,0The minimum level of completion of project tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
3,5In general, correctly performed project work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at about 60%.
4,0Well done project work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at about 70%.
4,5Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a project work or a test at the level of about 80%.
5,0Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięE_1A_O1/1_U01Human resources management in such a way that at the lowest biological cost achieve the highest efficiency.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówE_1A_U03Umie organizować pracę własną i zespołu
E_1A_U18Potrafi oceniać swoje działania ze względu na ich skutki ekonomiczno-finansowe, prawne i moralne
Cel przedmiotuC-1Obtaining the basics of knowledge about ergonomics. Mastering basic terms and conceptual categories.
C-5Having knowledge about employer's obligations and health and safety at work requirements and the ability to combine them with ergonomics recommendations for proper and effective work organization.
C-4he ability to formulate recommendations for improving the diagnosed disability of work organization and ways to reduce their effects.
C-3The ability to apply the assessment of the biological cost of work. Ability to assess workstations and factors that have a negative impact on work efficiency and knowledge of methods of diagnosing inefficiency of work organization.
C-2Understanding the process of improving working conditions and improving the organization of workstations as an aspect of effective and modern management. Understanding the relationship between good workplace organization and work efficiency.
Treści programoweT-P-3The biological cost of work. Analysis of the work process. Physical effort at work. Static and dynamic load at work. Physiology of mental effort, its evaluation. Physical and mental fatigue. Monotype and monotony.
T-P-4Material work environment as an element of the assessment of the biological labor cost: noise, vibration, microclimate, lighting, radiation and other hazards (chemical, biological). Impact on health, work safety and work efficiency. Hazards in the workplace and protection measures.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Explanatory methods (story, description, anecdote, explanation).
M-2Problem methods (problem lecture, conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
M-5Practical methods (demonstration, subject exercises).
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or project work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a project work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the project work and test grades.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Failure to pass, pass the project work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
3,0The minimum level of completion of project tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
3,5In general, correctly performed project work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at the level of approx. 60%.
4,0Well done project work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at the level of about 70%.
4,5Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a project work or a test at the level of about 80%.
5,0Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięE_1A_O1/1_U02The student has the ability to apply standards for shaping the material work environment.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówE_1A_U05Prawidłowo posługuje się normami oraz regułami prawno-organizacyjnymi w celu rozwiązywania konkretnego zadania z zakresu ekonomii
Cel przedmiotuC-1Obtaining the basics of knowledge about ergonomics. Mastering basic terms and conceptual categories.
C-5Having knowledge about employer's obligations and health and safety at work requirements and the ability to combine them with ergonomics recommendations for proper and effective work organization.
C-4he ability to formulate recommendations for improving the diagnosed disability of work organization and ways to reduce their effects.
C-2Understanding the process of improving working conditions and improving the organization of workstations as an aspect of effective and modern management. Understanding the relationship between good workplace organization and work efficiency.
Treści programoweT-P-5Organization of working time, breaks at work, shift work. Participation of physiology and occupational medicine in shaping working conditions.
T-P-4Material work environment as an element of the assessment of the biological labor cost: noise, vibration, microclimate, lighting, radiation and other hazards (chemical, biological). Impact on health, work safety and work efficiency. Hazards in the workplace and protection measures.
T-P-9Labour protection.
Metody nauczaniaM-4Programmed methods (using a computer, with the use of measuring equipment and teaching machines).
M-5Practical methods (demonstration, subject exercises).
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or project work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a project work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the project work and test grades.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0The student can not identify and deal with the difficulties that may arise in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He can not apply practically acquired knowledge, he has basic problems with interpretation and inference.
3,0Student is able to identify and deal with a sufficient grade (with the help of a teacher or with the support of third parties) with selected difficulties related to the application of the acquired knowledge. He has very limited ability to put knowledge into practice and makes mistakes in non-primary tasks.
3,5The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus can identify and deal with, provided that additional support is obtained, with difficulties associated with the use of acquired knowledge. Has limited ability to apply knowledge in practice and makes mistakes in tasks in more difficult tasks.
4,0The student, on the good mark can identify and independently deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. Without errors, he applies the acquired knowledge to solve simple and medium-difficult tasks, makes mistakes in interpretation and inferring in more difficult contexts.
4,5The student, on the assessment of a good plus can independently identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He skilfully interprets and concludes in most contexts and tasks before him, understands the sense of mistakes and has the ability to improve.
5,0Student, on the very good assessment, independently identifies and solves the difficulties associated with the process of applying knowledge in practice. Flawlessly interprets and concludes, regardless of the level of difficulty of the issues in the subject matter. Expands your skills by combining the knowledge and skills you have previously acquired and searching for optimal solutions.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięE_1A_O1/1_K01Awareness of the needs and capabilities of their and subordinate employees influences the increase of managerial and organizational skills.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówE_1A_K08Podejmowania odpowiedzialności za swoje zadania oraz zespołu, którym kieruje
Cel przedmiotuC-1Obtaining the basics of knowledge about ergonomics. Mastering basic terms and conceptual categories.
C-5Having knowledge about employer's obligations and health and safety at work requirements and the ability to combine them with ergonomics recommendations for proper and effective work organization.
C-4he ability to formulate recommendations for improving the diagnosed disability of work organization and ways to reduce their effects.
C-3The ability to apply the assessment of the biological cost of work. Ability to assess workstations and factors that have a negative impact on work efficiency and knowledge of methods of diagnosing inefficiency of work organization.
C-2Understanding the process of improving working conditions and improving the organization of workstations as an aspect of effective and modern management. Understanding the relationship between good workplace organization and work efficiency.
Treści programoweT-P-3The biological cost of work. Analysis of the work process. Physical effort at work. Static and dynamic load at work. Physiology of mental effort, its evaluation. Physical and mental fatigue. Monotype and monotony.
T-P-7Psychological stress at work: sources, threats, deficit / excess of information, time deficit.
T-P-2Outline of knowledge about human work. Types of work.
T-P-5Organization of working time, breaks at work, shift work. Participation of physiology and occupational medicine in shaping working conditions.
T-P-6Psychological factors of work organization. Signal perception. Sensory abilities of a human being, relations with the human nervous system. Visual communication (graphic symbols, codes, etc.) and voice.
T-P-8Areas of interest in modern ergonomics.
T-P-1Subject and scope of ergonomics. Layout: human - technical object - human environment as an object of ergonomics. Ergonomics as multidisciplinary knowledge. Concept and corrective ergonomics. Workplace with a screen monitor, ergonomics of office space.
Metody nauczaniaM-3Exposing methods (film, exhibition).
M-1Explanatory methods (story, description, anecdote, explanation).
M-4Programmed methods (using a computer, with the use of measuring equipment and teaching machines).
M-2Problem methods (problem lecture, conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
M-5Practical methods (demonstration, subject exercises).
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or project work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a project work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the project work and test grades.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0In the field of teamwork, the student is not able to plan and perform the work correctly and on time, does not report the need for assistance in consultations or despite this help does not achieve the minimum standards of performance.
3,0In the field of teamwork, the student plans and performs work in a clumsy way at each of its stages (preparatory, idea and project, executive, pre-presentation control and presentation itself).
3,5In the field of team work, the student is able to specify the goals of his own work and distributes or assists in discharging tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks. The student usually obtains a correct effect.
4,0In the field of team work, the student is able to specify the goals of his own work and distributes or assists in discharging tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks.
4,5In the field of teamwork, the student is able to independently plan, specify goals and actively participate in the distribution of tasks and their implementation at each stage of work.
5,0In the field of teamwork, the student: can independently plan, specify goals and distribute tasks by skills and control the situation of the project through proper motivation to act. The student demonstrates the timeliness and flawless way of presenting the results.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięE_1A_O1/1_K02The student has competence in the humanization of the work process.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówE_1A_K07Skutecznej realizacji postawionych zadań z jednoczesnym uwzględnieniem zasad etycznych
Cel przedmiotuC-1Obtaining the basics of knowledge about ergonomics. Mastering basic terms and conceptual categories.
C-4he ability to formulate recommendations for improving the diagnosed disability of work organization and ways to reduce their effects.
C-3The ability to apply the assessment of the biological cost of work. Ability to assess workstations and factors that have a negative impact on work efficiency and knowledge of methods of diagnosing inefficiency of work organization.
C-2Understanding the process of improving working conditions and improving the organization of workstations as an aspect of effective and modern management. Understanding the relationship between good workplace organization and work efficiency.
Treści programoweT-P-3The biological cost of work. Analysis of the work process. Physical effort at work. Static and dynamic load at work. Physiology of mental effort, its evaluation. Physical and mental fatigue. Monotype and monotony.
T-P-7Psychological stress at work: sources, threats, deficit / excess of information, time deficit.
T-P-5Organization of working time, breaks at work, shift work. Participation of physiology and occupational medicine in shaping working conditions.
T-P-4Material work environment as an element of the assessment of the biological labor cost: noise, vibration, microclimate, lighting, radiation and other hazards (chemical, biological). Impact on health, work safety and work efficiency. Hazards in the workplace and protection measures.
T-P-6Psychological factors of work organization. Signal perception. Sensory abilities of a human being, relations with the human nervous system. Visual communication (graphic symbols, codes, etc.) and voice.
T-P-8Areas of interest in modern ergonomics.
Metody nauczaniaM-4Programmed methods (using a computer, with the use of measuring equipment and teaching machines).
M-2Problem methods (problem lecture, conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
M-5Practical methods (demonstration, subject exercises).
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or project work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a project work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the project work and test grades.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Failure to pass, pass the project work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
3,0The minimum level of completion of project tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
3,5In general, correctly performed project work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at about 60%.
4,0Well done project work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at about 70%.
4,5Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a project work or a test at the level of about 80%.
5,0Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.