Administracja Centralna Uczelni - Wymiana międzynarodowa (S2)
Sylabus przedmiotu Thesis Preparation:
Informacje podstawowe
| Kierunek studiów | Wymiana międzynarodowa | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forma studiów | studia stacjonarne | Poziom | drugiego stopnia |
| Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta | |||
| Obszary studiów | — | ||
| Profil | |||
| Moduł | — | ||
| Przedmiot | Thesis Preparation | ||
| Specjalność | przedmiot wspólny | ||
| Jednostka prowadząca | Katedra Konstrukcji, Mechaniki i Technologii Okrętów | ||
| Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny | Zbigniew Sekulski <Zbigniew.Sekulski@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| Inni nauczyciele | |||
| ECTS (planowane) | 3,0 | ECTS (formy) | 3,0 |
| Forma zaliczenia | zaliczenie | Język | angielski |
| Blok obieralny | — | Grupa obieralna | — |
Formy dydaktyczne
Wymagania wstępne
| KOD | Wymaganie wstępne |
|---|---|
| W-1 | Not specified. |
Cele przedmiotu
| KOD | Cel modułu/przedmiotu |
|---|---|
| C-1 | Within the framework of the Thesis Preparation course, students will explore different ways of finding information, defining the scope of a project and doing research, as well as different ways of communicating the results. The course includes the stages of defining a topic and formulating a problem statement, selecting and reviewing relevant literature, designing an empirical study as well as performing it, including data collection and analysis, analysing the empirical data, make theoretical conclusions and finally writing and rewriting a written report. |
Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć
| KOD | Treść programowa | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| projekty | ||
| T-P-1 | The solution of practical problems related to issues discussed during lectures. | 75 |
| 75 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| T-W-1 | Organization of the Thesis: (1) front page, (2) student’s declaration on originality of the thesis; (3) dedication page (optional); (4) acknowledgement (optional); (5) vita (optional); (6) abstract; (7) table of contents; (8) list of tables (optional); (9) list of figures (optional); (10) list of symbols / abbreviations / notations / terminology (optional); (11) list of appendices; (12) introduction (relevance of the topic and the necessity for solution; practical and theoretical value of the topic; motives for choosing a particular topic; work aims and tasks; research object; research methods; an explanation of the work structure (brief overview of all parts, page, table and figure count); key literature used; work limitations and difficulties; plan of work and methodology; (13) assumptions and initial data; (14) theoretical section(s) (basic premises for the theoretical section; material sorting and the structure of the theoretical section; the requirements of the content for the theoretical section; preparation of theoretical model; the use and citation of the sources; highlighting the most important parts); (15) empirical (analytical) section (research methods, hypothesis, and data); (16) analysis, design, implementation and interpretation of results; (17) critical assessment of own work; (18) references / bibliography; (19) further Work; (20) summary & conclusion; (21) appendices (optional). | 8 |
| T-W-2 | Technical pointers for the final Master Thesis paper: text; citation in the text; quotations in the text; tables in the text; figures in the text. | 3 |
| T-W-3 | Copyright and plagiarism policy. | 2 |
| T-W-4 | Evaluation of knowedge. | 2 |
| 15 | ||
Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności
| KOD | Forma aktywności | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| projekty | ||
| A-P-1 | Thesis preparation. | 60 |
| 60 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| A-W-1 | Activity specified for the thesis subject. | 30 |
| 30 | ||
Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne
| KOD | Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne |
|---|---|
| M-1 | Project |
Sposoby oceny
| KOD | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|
| S-1 | Ocena podsumowująca: Students will be expected to complete written tests, projects and homework assignments as specified by the teacher. |
| S-2 | Ocena formująca: Student attendance and participation in class sessions play a vital role in successful course completion. |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM-WTMiT_2-_null_W01 To be abble to thesis preparation. | — | — | C-1 | T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3 | M-1 | S-1, S-2 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM-WTMiT_2-_null_U01 Upon completion of this course, the student has achieved the following learning outcomes: (1) the student has access to and insight in (the diversity and boundaries of) the discipline of communication professionals; (2) the student is able to find and select the relevant professional literature by making use of (online) databases; (3) the student is able to evaluate, interpret and compare different academic sources and to use these sources in a project paper; (4) the student is able to write a clear project paper; (5) the student is able to evaluate the findings, strengths and limitations of a certain project line and is able to reflect on this. The learning outcomes of this course will be communicated to the students during the first lectures. | — | — | C-1 | T-P-1, T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3 | M-1 | S-1, S-2 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM-WTMiT_2-_null_K01 Improvement of social and personal competencies including self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, responsible decision-making and others. | — | — | C-1 | T-P-1 | M-1 | S-1, S-2 |
Kryterium oceny - wiedza
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| WM-WTMiT_2-_null_W01 To be abble to thesis preparation. | 2,0 | Students performing at this level demonstrate no evidence of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the course assessed at their grade level. The range for the grade of 2.0 is from 0% to 50% of the total possible score (100%). |
| 3,0 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a minimal command of the knowledge and/or skills embodied by the course assessed at their grade level. The range for the grade of 3.0 is from 51% to 60% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 3,5 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a beginning command of the knowledge and/or skills embodied by the course assessed at their grade level. The range for the grade of 3.5 is from 61% to 70% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 4,0 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a developing command of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the course at their grade level. The range for the grade of 4.0 is from 71% to 80% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 4,5 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a moderate command of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the course. Students at this level are approaching the standards at their grade level. The range for the grade of 4.5 is from 81% to 90% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 5,0 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a distinguished and strong command of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the course. Students at this level are meeting or extending the standards at their grade level. The range for the grade of 5.0 is from 91% to 100% of the total possible score (100%). |
Kryterium oceny - umiejętności
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| WM-WTMiT_2-_null_U01 Upon completion of this course, the student has achieved the following learning outcomes: (1) the student has access to and insight in (the diversity and boundaries of) the discipline of communication professionals; (2) the student is able to find and select the relevant professional literature by making use of (online) databases; (3) the student is able to evaluate, interpret and compare different academic sources and to use these sources in a project paper; (4) the student is able to write a clear project paper; (5) the student is able to evaluate the findings, strengths and limitations of a certain project line and is able to reflect on this. The learning outcomes of this course will be communicated to the students during the first lectures. | 2,0 | Failing. Students performing at this level demonstrate no evidence of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the course assessed at their grade level. The range for the grade of 2.0 is from 0% to 50% of the total possible score (100%). |
| 3,0 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a minimal command of the knowledge and/or skills embodied by the course assessed at their grade level. The range for the grade of 3.0 is from 51% to 60% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 3,5 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a beginning command of the knowledge and/or skills embodied by the course assessed at their grade level. The range for the grade of 3.5 is from 61% to 70% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 4,0 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a developing command of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the course at their grade level. The range for the grade of 4.0 is from 71% to 80% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 4,5 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a moderate command of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the course. Students at this level are approaching the standards at their grade level. The range for the grade of 4.5 is from 81% to 90% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 5,0 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a distinguished and strong command of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the course. Students at this level are meeting or extending the standards at their grade level. The range for the grade of 5.0 is from 91% to 100% of the total possible score (100%). |
Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| WM-WTMiT_2-_null_K01 Improvement of social and personal competencies including self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, responsible decision-making and others. | 2,0 | Students performing at this level demonstrate no evidence of increased social and emotional skills, improved attitude toward self and others, improved positive social behaviors, decreased conduct problems and emotional distress. |
| 3,0 | Acceptable student's achivements in increased social and emotional skills, improved attitude toward self and others, improved positive social behaviors, decreased conduct problems and emotional distress. | |
| 3,5 | Below average student's achivements in increased social and emotional skills, improved attitude toward self and others, improved positive social behaviors, decreased conduct problems and emotional distress. | |
| 4,0 | Average student's achivements in increased social and emotional skills, improved attitude toward self and others, improved positive social behaviors, decreased conduct problems and emotional distress. | |
| 4,5 | Above average student's achivements in increased social and emotional skills, improved attitude toward self and others, improved positive social behaviors, decreased conduct problems and emotional distress. | |
| 5,0 | Oustending student's achivements in increased social and emotional skills, improved attitude toward self and others, improved positive social behaviors, decreased conduct problems and emotional distress. |
Literatura podstawowa
- Russel L. Ackoff, Scientific method: Optimizing Applied Research Decisions, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1962
Literatura dodatkowa
- Jan BABICZ, Encyclopedia of ship knowledge, Baobab Naval Consultancy, Gdańsk, 2007