Wydział Ekonomiczny - Economics (S1)
Sylabus przedmiotu Regional economy:
Informacje podstawowe
| Kierunek studiów | Economics | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forma studiów | studia stacjonarne | Poziom | pierwszego stopnia |
| Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta | licencjat | ||
| Obszary studiów | charakterystyki PRK | ||
| Profil | ogólnoakademicki | ||
| Moduł | — | ||
| Przedmiot | Regional economy | ||
| Specjalność | przedmiot wspólny | ||
| Jednostka prowadząca | Katedra Studiów Regionalnych i Europejskich | ||
| Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny | Agnieszka Brelik <Agnieszka.Brelik@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| Inni nauczyciele | |||
| ECTS (planowane) | 3,0 | ECTS (formy) | 3,0 |
| Forma zaliczenia | egzamin | Język | polski |
| Blok obieralny | — | Grupa obieralna | — |
Formy dydaktyczne
Wymagania wstępne
| KOD | Wymaganie wstępne |
|---|---|
| W-1 | Basic knowledge requirements in the field of economic policy and geography at the high school level. |
Cele przedmiotu
| KOD | Cel modułu/przedmiotu |
|---|---|
| C-1 | The aim of the course is to show the development processes taking place in the economy on a global, regional and local scale. |
| C-2 | The aim of the course is to enable students to acquire knowledge about the region, regional policy, He should have knowledge about factors affecting the development of regions. The student should know how to use European funds for the development of regions. |
Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć
| KOD | Treść programowa | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| ćwiczenia audytoryjne | ||
| T-A-1 | Management of the region's development. Instruments of regional and local policy. | 2 |
| T-A-2 | Public administration and regional and local economy. Regional development strategies. | 2 |
| T-A-3 | Regional problems of Poland. Regional policy in the period of transformation. National Strategy of Regional Development. European regional development fund. | 3 |
| T-A-4 | Urban projects that can be implemented as part of community initiatives. Cross-border connections with neighboring countries and voivodships. | 2 |
| T-A-5 | SWOT analysis of the West Pomeranian region and other selected voivodships. | 2 |
| T-A-6 | Presentation of final papers and discussion. | 4 |
| 15 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| T-W-1 | Definition of the region and types of criteria for the region extraction. Typology of regions. Selected theories of regional development. | 2 |
| T-W-2 | Features of regional policy. Features of the region. Measures of the region's development. Regionalism. Fields of regional and local economic development. | 3 |
| T-W-3 | Spatial structure of the economy. Spatial development plan woj. West Pomeranian. | 2 |
| T-W-4 | Territorial diversification of socio-economic development. | 2 |
| T-W-5 | Regions in Europe and Poland. Euro-regions. Region of the province West Pomeranian | 2 |
| T-W-6 | Globalization. Global and regional and local economy. Development trends of the region. | 3 |
| T-W-7 | Passing the lecture | 1 |
| 15 | ||
Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności
| KOD | Forma aktywności | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| ćwiczenia audytoryjne | ||
| A-A-1 | Participation in classes | 15 |
| A-A-2 | Preparation of a description of the region by the student along with a multimedia presentation | 15 |
| A-A-3 | Preparation to pass the exercises | 10 |
| A-A-4 | Search for new literature and familiarize yourself with the literature indicated by the teacher | 8 |
| A-A-5 | Search for current information on regional internet portals | 12 |
| 60 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| A-W-1 | Participation in classes | 15 |
| A-W-2 | Studying obligatory and complementary literature on the subject. | 10 |
| A-W-3 | Preparation for passing. | 5 |
| 30 | ||
Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne
| KOD | Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne |
|---|---|
| M-1 | Feeding methods - explanations. Information and problem lecture - multimeial presentation. |
| M-2 | Activation method - didactic discussion related to information prepared by students about the economic situation that occurred in the time between exercises. |
Sposoby oceny
| KOD | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|
| S-1 | Ocena formująca: assessment of a partial colloquium |
| S-2 | Ocena formująca: evaluation of independent acquisition of knowledge and its presentation |
| S-3 | Ocena podsumowująca: assessment of passing the exercise |
| S-4 | Ocena podsumowująca: written exam, commands and open questions |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E_1A_C3_W01 student has knowledge about basic terminology in the region and regional development | E_1A_W01, E_1A_W02, E_1A_W10, E_1A_W13, E_1A_W14, E_1A_W15 | — | C-1, C-2 | T-W-2, T-W-5 | M-1, M-2 | S-1, S-2, S-3, S-4 |
| E_1A_C3_W02 student has knowledge about the economy of Polish regions as well as selected EU regions | E_1A_W02, E_1A_W05 | — | C-1, C-2 | T-A-3, T-A-5 | M-1, M-2 | S-1, S-2, S-3, S-4 |
| E_1A_C3_W03 student has knowledge about community initiatives as well as the European Regional Development Fund | E_1A_W02, E_1A_W06, E_1A_W11, E_1A_W14, E_1A_W15 | — | C-1, C-2 | T-W-2, T-W-6 | M-1, M-2 | S-2, S-3 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E_1A_C3_U01 student has the ability to present and describe a selected region of Poland and Europe | E_1A_U02, E_1A_U10, E_1A_U12, E_1A_U13, E_1A_U16, E_1A_U17 | — | C-2 | T-W-2, T-W-4, T-W-6 | M-1, M-2 | S-1, S-2 |
| E_1A_C3_U02 Student has the ability to distinguish between Polish and European regions in economic terms, | E_1A_U04, E_1A_U18, E_1A_U19, E_1A_U20 | — | C-1, C-2 | T-A-3, T-W-6, T-W-5 | M-2 | S-1, S-3, S-4 |
| E_1A_C3_U03 Student Is able to carry out a SWOT analysis of a selected region and indicate its competitiveness | E_1A_U06, E_1A_U07, E_1A_U10, E_1A_U16, E_1A_U19, E_1A_U20 | — | C-1, C-2 | T-A-1, T-A-3, T-W-4 | M-1 | S-1, S-2, S-3, S-4 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E_1A_C3_K01 Student is able to cooperate in a group, takes various roles in it | E_1A_K03, E_1A_K04, E_1A_K06, E_1A_K07 | — | C-2 | T-A-1, T-A-4 | M-2 | S-1 |
| E_1A_C3_K02 Student is aware of the necessity of continuing education | E_1A_K07 | — | C-2 | T-A-3, T-W-3 | M-1, M-2 | S-1, S-3 |
Kryterium oceny - wiedza
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| E_1A_C3_W01 student has knowledge about basic terminology in the region and regional development | 2,0 | Student does not know the basic definitions of the region and the types of criteria for separating the region. |
| 3,0 | Student knows the basic issues concerning the regions to a sufficient extent | |
| 3,5 | Student can list the features of the region and regionalism, as well as the basic issues of the subject to a degree greater than sufficient | |
| 4,0 | Student can define the concept of reional development and types of regions to a good degree | |
| 4,5 | Student can define the concept of reional development and types of regions to a good degree | |
| 5,0 | Student's knowledge mastered to a very good degree, and even beyond the scope of the material provided | |
| E_1A_C3_W02 student has knowledge about the economy of Polish regions as well as selected EU regions | 2,0 | Student does not have knowledge about the economy of Polish regions and selected regions of the European Union |
| 3,0 | Student knows the basic issues regarding the regions to a sufficient degree | |
| 3,5 | Student can list the features of the national economy and the Community economy to a degree greater than sufficient | |
| 4,0 | Student mastered the knowledge passed on by the teacher | |
| 4,5 | Student has mastered the subject knowledge and speaks without difficulty | |
| 5,0 | Student very well acquired knowledge, the student can list the regions of the European Union, characterize the economy at the regional, national and Community level | |
| E_1A_C3_W03 student has knowledge about community initiatives as well as the European Regional Development Fund | 2,0 | Student has no knowledge about community initiatives, he has no knowledge about the European Regional Development Fund |
| 3,0 | Student in a very narrow range, he can describe the community economy | |
| 3,5 | Student can explain and distinguish between regions' economies at a level greater than sufficient | |
| 4,0 | Student mastered the knowledge of the subject to a good degree | |
| 4,5 | Student additionally explains the characteristics of the European Regional Development Fund, without difficulty indicates the development of selected regions thanks to EU funds | |
| 5,0 | Student very well mastered the knowledge given by the subject |
Kryterium oceny - umiejętności
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| E_1A_C3_U01 student has the ability to present and describe a selected region of Poland and Europe | 2,0 | Student does not have basic knowledge of the regional economy |
| 3,0 | Student sufficiently mastered the basic programming material | |
| 3,5 | Student mastered the basic range of material to a better degree than sufficient, but he makes minor mistakes in the content | |
| 4,0 | Student is able to determine the specificity of entities in the region's economy at a good level | |
| 4,5 | Student has the ability to use techniques and methods to determine the region, can indicate the characteristics of the region's competitiveness | |
| 5,0 | Student mastered the transferred knowledge, can easily indicate the specific competitiveness of selected regions of Poland and Europe. He can think and act independently. | |
| E_1A_C3_U02 Student has the ability to distinguish between Polish and European regions in economic terms, | 2,0 | Student does not have basic knowledge of the regional economy |
| 3,0 | Student sufficiently mastered the basic programming material | |
| 3,5 | Student mastered the basic range of material to a better degree than sufficient, but he makes minor mistakes in the content | |
| 4,0 | Student is able to determine the specificity of entities in the region's economy at a good level | |
| 4,5 | Student has the ability to use techniques and methods to determine the region, can indicate the characteristics of the region's competitiveness | |
| 5,0 | Student mastered the transferred knowledge, can easily indicate the specific competitiveness of selected regions of Poland and Europe. He can think and act independently. | |
| E_1A_C3_U03 Student Is able to carry out a SWOT analysis of a selected region and indicate its competitiveness | 2,0 | Student does not have basic knowledge of the regional economy |
| 3,0 | Student sufficiently mastered the basic programming material | |
| 3,5 | Student mastered the basic range of material to a better degree than sufficient, but he makes minor mistakes in the content | |
| 4,0 | Student is able to determine the specificity of entities in the region's economy at a good level | |
| 4,5 | Student has the ability to use techniques and methods to determine the region, can indicate the characteristics of the region's competitiveness | |
| 5,0 | Student mastered the transferred knowledge at a very good level, can easily indicate the specific competitiveness of selected regions of Poland and Europe. He can think and act on his own. |
Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| E_1A_C3_K01 Student is able to cooperate in a group, takes various roles in it | 2,0 | Student does not know the basic concepts of regional economy |
| 3,0 | Student sufficiently mastered the basic programming materia | |
| 3,5 | Student: - mastered the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in the field of mastering knowledge, he acquired the basic program content, - in the range of relation to the average, interested - in the field of expressing knowledge, she makes many minor mistakes in the content and language. | |
| 4,0 | Student: -in terms of knowledge, he mastered all program material - in the field of understanding of knowledge, he mastered the entire scope of the material almost correctly - in the field of mastering knowledge, he acquired the basic program content - shows interest in relation to knowledge - in the field of expressing knowledge, he commits slight negligence in content and language | |
| 4,5 | Student: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered all program material - in the field of understanding of knowledge, he mastered the whole scope of the material - in the field of mastering knowledge, he acquired the entirety of program content - is very interested in relation to knowledge - shows knowledge without difficulty | |
| 5,0 | Student: - in the field of knowledge, he mastered all the program material and even transcends it - in the field of understanding of knowledge, he correctly mastered the whole scope of the material - acquired the program content in the field of knowledge acquisition - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge, he shows cognitive curiosity - in the field of expressing knowledge - it does so without difficulty, and theses are correct and certain | |
| E_1A_C3_K02 Student is aware of the necessity of continuing education | 2,0 | Student does not know the basic concepts of regional economy |
| 3,0 | Student sufficiently mastered the basic programming material | |
| 3,5 | Student: - mastered the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in the field of mastering knowledge, he acquired boring programming contents, - in the range of relation to the average, interested - in the field of expressing knowledge, she makes many minor mistakes in the content and language. | |
| 4,0 | Student - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the entire program material - in the field of understanding of knowledge, he mastered the entire scope of the material almost correctly - in the field of mastering knowledge, he acquired the basic program content - shows interest in relation to knowledge - in the field of expressing knowledge, he commits slight negligence in content and language | |
| 4,5 | Student - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the entire program material - in the field of understanding of knowledge, he mastered the whole scope of the material - in the field of mastering knowledge, he acquired the entirety of program content - is very interested in relation to knowledge - shows knowledge without difficulty | |
| 5,0 | Student: - in the field of knowledge, he mastered all the program material and even transcends it - in the field of understanding of knowledge, he correctly mastered the whole scope of the material - acquired the program content in the field of knowledge acquisition - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge, he shows cognitive curiosity - in the field of expressing knowledge - it does so without difficulty, and theses are correct and certain |
Literatura podstawowa
- J. Jones, C. Wren, Foreign Direct Investment and the Regional Economy, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2006
- Susumu Egashira, Globalism and Regional Economy, Rouledge, NY, 2014
Literatura dodatkowa
- Cooke Philip, Regional Development in the Knowledge Economy, Taylor & Francis Ltd, NY, 2009