Wydział Technologii i Inżynierii Chemicznej - Technologia chemiczna (S2)
specjalność: Technologia środków pomocniczych i kosmetyków
Sylabus przedmiotu Master thesis:
Informacje podstawowe
| Kierunek studiów | Technologia chemiczna | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forma studiów | studia stacjonarne | Poziom | drugiego stopnia |
| Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta | magister inżynier | ||
| Obszary studiów | charakterystyki PRK, kompetencje inżynierskie PRK | ||
| Profil | ogólnoakademicki | ||
| Moduł | — | ||
| Przedmiot | Master thesis | ||
| Specjalność | Inorganic Chemical Technology | ||
| Jednostka prowadząca | Katedra Inżynierii Materiałów Katalitycznych i Sorpcyjnych | ||
| Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny | Beata Michalkiewicz <Beata.Michalkiewicz@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| Inni nauczyciele | |||
| ECTS (planowane) | 20,0 | ECTS (formy) | 20,0 |
| Forma zaliczenia | zaliczenie | Język | angielski |
| Blok obieralny | — | Grupa obieralna | — |
Formy dydaktyczne
Wymagania wstępne
| KOD | Wymaganie wstępne |
|---|---|
| W-1 | Math I and II Inorganic Chemistry I and II Physical Chemistry I and II Chemical Technology Chemical Engineering Mathematical Modeling Chemical reactors |
Cele przedmiotu
| KOD | Cel modułu/przedmiotu |
|---|---|
| C-1 | write a thesis |
| C-2 | strengthen and systematize the knowledge acquired in the course of study |
Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć
| KOD | Treść programowa | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| praca dyplomowa | ||
| T-PD-1 | art of writing the thesis | 0 |
| T-PD-2 | popularization of scientific research | 0 |
| 0 | ||
Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności
| KOD | Forma aktywności | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| praca dyplomowa | ||
| A-PD-1 | Reading the literature related to the topic of the thesis | 200 |
| A-PD-2 | Production of results of investigations related to the thesis | 200 |
| A-PD-3 | Production of results of investigations related to the thesis | 145 |
| A-PD-4 | Prepare a presentation of research results related to thesis | 50 |
| A-PD-5 | Presentation of research results related to the thesis | 5 |
| 600 | ||
Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne
| KOD | Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne |
|---|---|
| M-1 | indywidual discussion |
| M-2 | individual instruction |
Sposoby oceny
| KOD | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|
| S-1 | Ocena formująca: evaluate the activity and creativity |
| S-2 | Ocena formująca: evaluation of progress |
| S-3 | Ocena podsumowująca: evaluation of the thesis |
| S-4 | Ocena podsumowująca: exam |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżyniera | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCH_2A_D12-14_W01 has extensive knowledge of the mathematical description of the process, research on the influence of technological parameters on the process speed, efficiency and selectivity of the desired product and the conversion | TCH_2A_W09 | — | — | C-2 | T-PD-1, T-PD-2 | M-1 | S-4 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżyniera | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCH_2A_D12-14_U01 use literature data and our own research to prepare the scientific publication in English | TCH_2A_U20, TCH_2A_U11, TCH_2A_U12, TCH_2A_U19 | — | — | C-1 | T-PD-1 | M-1, M-2 | S-2, S-1 |
| TCH_2A_D12-14_U02 analyzes, compares and evaluates both new and existing research methods and technological solutions related to the topic of the thesis | TCH_2A_U20, TCH_2A_U11, TCH_2A_U12, TCH_2A_U19 | — | — | C-1 | T-PD-1 | M-1, M-2 | S-2, S-1 |
| TCH_2A_D12-14_U03 validates test benches used in thesis | TCH_2A_U19 | — | — | C-1 | T-PD-1 | M-1, M-2 | S-3, S-1 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżyniera | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCH_2A_D12-14_K01 actively participates in events such scientific picnics presenting the results of his thesis | TCH_2A_K02 | — | — | C-1 | T-PD-2 | M-1, M-2 | S-2, S-1 |
| TCH_2A_D12-14_K02 happy accede to supplement their knowledge related to the thesis | TCH_2A_K03 | — | — | C-1 | T-PD-1 | M-1, M-2 | S-2, S-1 |
| TCH_2A_D12-14_K03 has the ability to determine priorities writing a thesis | TCH_2A_K04 | — | — | C-1 | T-PD-1 | M-1, M-2 | S-2, S-3, S-1 |
Kryterium oceny - wiedza
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| TCH_2A_D12-14_W01 has extensive knowledge of the mathematical description of the process, research on the influence of technological parameters on the process speed, efficiency and selectivity of the desired product and the conversion | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | in 51% has extensive knowledge of the mathematical description of the process, research on the influence of technological parameters on the process speed, efficiency and selectivity of the desired product and the conversion | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 |
Kryterium oceny - umiejętności
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| TCH_2A_D12-14_U01 use literature data and our own research to prepare the scientific publication in English | 2,0 | can not use literature data and our own research to prepare the scientific publication in English |
| 3,0 | in at least 51% can use literature data and our own research to prepare the scientific publication in English | |
| 3,5 | in at least 61% can use literature data and our own research to prepare the scientific publication in English | |
| 4,0 | in at least 71% can use literature data and our own research to prepare the scientific publication in English | |
| 4,5 | in at least 81% can use literature data and our own research to prepare the scientific publication in English | |
| 5,0 | in at least 91% can use literature data and our own research to prepare the scientific publication in English | |
| TCH_2A_D12-14_U02 analyzes, compares and evaluates both new and existing research methods and technological solutions related to the topic of the thesis | 2,0 | can not analyzes, compares and evaluates both new and existing research methods and technological solutions related to the topic of the thesis |
| 3,0 | in at least 51% can analyzes, compares and evaluates both new and existing research methods and technological solutions related to the topic of the thesis | |
| 3,5 | in at least 61% can analyzes, compares and evaluates both new and existing research methods and technological solutions related to the topic of the thesis | |
| 4,0 | in at least 71% can analyzes, compares and evaluates both new and existing research methods and technological solutions related to the topic of the thesis | |
| 4,5 | in at least 81% can analyzes, compares and evaluates both new and existing research methods and technological solutions related to the topic of the thesis | |
| 5,0 | in at least 91% can analyzes, compares and evaluates both new and existing research methods and technological solutions related to the topic of the thesis | |
| TCH_2A_D12-14_U03 validates test benches used in thesis | 2,0 | can not validates test benches used in thesis |
| 3,0 | in at least 51% can validates test benches used in thesis | |
| 3,5 | in at least 61% can validates test benches used in thesis | |
| 4,0 | in at least 71% can validates test benches used in thesis | |
| 4,5 | in at least 81% can validates test benches used in thesis | |
| 5,0 | in at least 91% can validates test benches used in thesis |
Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| TCH_2A_D12-14_K01 actively participates in events such scientific picnics presenting the results of his thesis | 2,0 | can not actively participates in events such scientific picnics presenting the results of his thesis |
| 3,0 | in at least 51% can actively participates in events such scientific picnics presenting the results of his thesis | |
| 3,5 | in at least 61% can actively participates in events such scientific picnics presenting the results of his thesis | |
| 4,0 | in at least 71% can actively participates in events such scientific picnics presenting the results of his thesis | |
| 4,5 | in at least 81% can actively participates in events such scientific picnics presenting the results of his thesis | |
| 5,0 | in at least 91% can actively participates in events such scientific picnics presenting the results of his thesis | |
| TCH_2A_D12-14_K02 happy accede to supplement their knowledge related to the thesis | 2,0 | can not happy accede to supplement their knowledge related to the thesis |
| 3,0 | in at least 51% can happy accede to supplement their knowledge related to the thesis | |
| 3,5 | in at least 61% can happy accede to supplement their knowledge related to the thesis | |
| 4,0 | in at least 71% can happy accede to supplement their knowledge related to the thesis | |
| 4,5 | in at least 81% can happy accede to supplement their knowledge related to the thesis | |
| 5,0 | in at least 91% can happy accede to supplement their knowledge related to the thesis | |
| TCH_2A_D12-14_K03 has the ability to determine priorities writing a thesis | 2,0 | can not has the ability to determine priorities writing a thesis |
| 3,0 | in at least 51% can has the ability to determine priorities writing a thesis | |
| 3,5 | in at least 61% can has the ability to determine priorities writing a thesis | |
| 4,0 | in at least 71% can has the ability to determine priorities writing a thesis | |
| 4,5 | in at least 81% can has the ability to determine priorities writing a thesis | |
| 5,0 | in at least 91% can has the ability to determine priorities writing a thesis |
Literatura podstawowa
- not applicable literature thematically related to the topic of the thesis, literature thematically related to the topic of the thesis, 2011