Wydział Ekonomiczny - Economics (S1)
specjalność: Property Valuation and Real Estate Transactions
Sylabus przedmiotu Economic projects using EU funds:
Informacje podstawowe
| Kierunek studiów | Economics | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forma studiów | studia stacjonarne | Poziom | pierwszego stopnia |
| Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta | licencjat | ||
| Obszary studiów | charakterystyki PRK | ||
| Profil | ogólnoakademicki | ||
| Moduł | — | ||
| Przedmiot | Economic projects using EU funds | ||
| Specjalność | przedmiot wspólny | ||
| Jednostka prowadząca | Katedra Studiów Regionalnych i Europejskich | ||
| Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny | Bartosz Mickiewicz <Bartosz.Mickiewicz@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| Inni nauczyciele | Milena Bera <Milena.Bera@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| ECTS (planowane) | 2,0 | ECTS (formy) | 2,0 |
| Forma zaliczenia | zaliczenie | Język | polski |
| Blok obieralny | 2 | Grupa obieralna | 2 |
Formy dydaktyczne
Wymagania wstępne
| KOD | Wymaganie wstępne |
|---|---|
| W-1 | Basics of knowledge in subjects: macroeconomics, microeconomics. |
Cele przedmiotu
| KOD | Cel modułu/przedmiotu |
|---|---|
| C-1 | The student knows the practical methods and tools necessary for the planning and management of projects co-financed from public funds, mainly from the European Union funds. |
| C-2 | Developing skills in the use of such project planning tools as the project life cycle, identification of problems and needs, "problem tree" and "goal tree", logical matrix (LFA), Gantt chart as a set of methods recommended by the European Commission. |
| C-3 | Preparing and conducting presentations on the basic issues of EU policy, European funds and operational programs. |
| C-4 | Shaping skills in building a partnership for the implementation of projects. |
Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć
| KOD | Treść programowa | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| ćwiczenia audytoryjne | ||
| T-A-1 | The logic of intervention of EU funds. | 5 |
| T-A-2 | EU policy and tools for their implementation. | 5 |
| T-A-3 | Legal basis for granting support from EU funds and operational programs. | 4 |
| T-A-4 | Project - definitions. Features of a good design. Project cycle. Methodology of project cycle management. Active project planning method - analysis and planning phase. | 5 |
| T-A-5 | Phase of analysis: analysis of subjects, analysis of problems (problem tree), analysis of goals (goal tree), analysis of options and choice of strategy. | 4 |
| T-A-6 | Planning phase: logical matrix (definition, limitations related to the logic table), risk analysis, project indicators (product, result, impact) project schedule (Gantt chart), resource utilization plan and budget. | 4 |
| T-A-7 | Methods for the evaluation of economic projects: economic and financial (static and dynamic) methods for assessing investment projects. | 1 |
| T-A-8 | Project implementation (monitoring and reporting). Evaluation and control of the project. Building a partnership for the implementation of projects. | 2 |
| 30 | ||
Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności
| KOD | Forma aktywności | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| ćwiczenia audytoryjne | ||
| A-A-1 | Participation in practicales | 30 |
| A-A-2 | Reading the indicated literature in the field of preparing economic projects and the European funds. | 10 |
| A-A-3 | Preparing for the colloquium. | 5 |
| A-A-4 | Preparation of a project on the use of EU funds. | 7 |
| A-A-5 | Consultation | 6 |
| A-A-6 | Colloquium | 2 |
| 60 | ||
Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne
| KOD | Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne |
|---|---|
| M-1 | Presenting methods |
| M-2 | Lecture |
| M-3 | Programmed-exposing methods (demonstration). |
Sposoby oceny
| KOD | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|
| S-1 | Ocena formująca: Evaluation of student's progress in acquiring knowledge by asking oral questions at the beginning of the classes. |
| S-2 | Ocena podsumowująca: Evaluation of the economic project prepared in groups using EU funds. |
| S-3 | Ocena podsumowująca: Rating from the colloquium checking knowledge gained during classes. |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E_1A_O13_W01 The student has a basic knowledge of institutions involved in the project financing processes from EU funds at the EU and national level. Knowledge in the field of planning including, in particular, the planning of economic projects and the economic and financial analysis necessary for the economic justification of the project. | E_1A_W03, E_1A_W12 | — | C-2, C-3, C-4, C-1 | T-A-4, T-A-5, T-A-6, T-A-7, T-A-8 | M-1, M-2, M-3 | S-1, S-2, S-3 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E_1A_O13_U01 The development of the project requires the cooperation of the student team and the practical application of the acquired knowledge. | E_1A_U03 | — | C-2, C-3, C-4 | T-A-4, T-A-5, T-A-6, T-A-8 | M-3 | S-2 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E_1A_O13_K01 The implementation of projects using EU funds requires an absolute knowledge of the principles of sustainable development, and only with their consideration it is possible to obtain such funds. | E_1A_K06 | — | C-2, C-3, C-4, C-1 | T-A-2, T-A-3, T-A-4, T-A-5, T-A-6, T-A-7, T-A-8 | M-1, M-2, M-3 | S-2 |
Kryterium oceny - wiedza
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| E_1A_O13_W01 The student has a basic knowledge of institutions involved in the project financing processes from EU funds at the EU and national level. Knowledge in the field of planning including, in particular, the planning of economic projects and the economic and financial analysis necessary for the economic justification of the project. | 2,0 | The student is not able to: - define basic concepts of the subject, - indicate what is the subject literature and what is the goal, subject and the most important issues within the program, - formulate a short (even incomplete) but correct statement for the majority of the subject areas discussed in the classes. The student receives an unsatisfactory grade if he / she does not show interest in the program content or evades the activity and his / her absence does not guarantee that the material is catching up. |
| 3,0 | Student, for a satisfactory grade: - in the field of knowledge, he mastered and absorbed the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in the range of attitudes towards knowledge, the average interested (partially indifferent), - in the field of expressing knowledge, she commits many minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements is largely incorrect). | |
| 3,5 | A student at a satisfactory plus grade: - in the area of knowledge he mastered the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in terms of the ratio to the knowledge transferred, the average interest remains, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he makes minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements partly incorrect). | |
| 4,0 | Student, for a good grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered almost all programming material and knowledge acquired the basic content of the program almost exactly, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he almost completely mastered the entire scope of the material, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge, it shows interest, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he commits slight deficiencies (statements have slight errors). | |
| 4,5 | Student, for good plus grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the program material,- in terms of understanding knowledge, he mastered all program content, properly explains their meaning- shows interest in relation to knowledge,- speaks without difficulty using the substantive vocabulary. | |
| 5,0 | Student, for very good grade: - in terms of knowledge, it goes beyond the curriculum material, - demonstrates the understanding of knowledge without reservations to the course of reasoning, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a lot of interest and cognitive curiosity, can propose a context in which knowledge finds or can find practical application, - speaks a faultless language, properly substantive. |
Kryterium oceny - umiejętności
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| E_1A_O13_U01 The development of the project requires the cooperation of the student team and the practical application of the acquired knowledge. | 2,0 | The student can not identify and deal with the difficulties that may arise in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He can not apply practically acquired knowledge, he has basic problems with interpretation and inference. |
| 3,0 | The student, for a satisfactory grade, can identify and deal with (with the help of a teacher or with the support of third parties) with selected difficulties related to the use of acquired knowledge. He has very limited ability to put knowledge into practice and makes mistakes in non-primary tasks. | |
| 3,5 | The student, for the grade of a sufficient plus, can identify and deal with, provided that additional support is obtained, with difficulties related to the application of the acquired knowledge. Has limited ability to apply knowledge in practice and makes mistakes in tasks in more difficult tasks. | |
| 4,0 | Student, on the good grade, can identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. Without errors, he applies the acquired knowledge to solve simple and medium-difficult tasks, makes mistakes in interpretation and inferring in more difficult contexts. | |
| 4,5 | The student, for the grade of a good plus can independently identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He skilfully interprets and concludes in most contexts and tasks before him, understands the sense of mistakes and has the ability to improve. | |
| 5,0 | The student, for the very good grade, independently identifies and solves the difficulties associated with the process with the application of knowledge in practice. Flawlessly interprets and concludes, regardless of the level of difficulty of the issues in the subject matter. Expands your skills by combining the knowledge and skills you have previously acquired and searching for optimal solutions. |
Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| E_1A_O13_K01 The implementation of projects using EU funds requires an absolute knowledge of the principles of sustainable development, and only with their consideration it is possible to obtain such funds. | 2,0 | The student has no basic knowledge of the subject, which prevents him from showing competence. He presents wrong views and opinions, even in the situation of hints, he can not present competences in correct inference and interpretation skills. It reveals the lack of commitment and the lack of willingness to do the job in a proper way. |
| 3,0 | The student, on a satisfactory grade, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, with numerous errors not fully qualified. | |
| 3,5 | The student, for the grade of a sufficient plus, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, is able to plan the performance of the work and reveals the ability to complete the basic scope of the plan. He makes mistakes, but he usually carries out key areas correctly. | |
| 4,0 | The student, for the good grade, presents opinions and views proving the understanding of the subject matter and obtaining the basic skills for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills. | |
| 4,5 | The student, for the grade of a good plus, presents opinions and views proving the meaning of the key subject of the subject and the possibilities and abilities for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills. | |
| 5,0 | The student, on the very good grade, presents opinions and views that show the meaning of subject matter and possibilities and the ability to use the acquired knowledge and skills in the future. |
Literatura podstawowa
- Benjamin C. Esty, Modern Project Finance: A Casebook, John Wiley & Sons, 2008, ISBN-13: 978-0471434252
- M. A. Mian, Project Economics and Decision Analysis: Probabilistic Models, PennWell Corp.; 2 edition, 2015, ISBN-13: 978-1593702090
Literatura dodatkowa
- Colective work, The Evaluation of Enterprise. A Critical View, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2018, ISBN13 (EAN): 9781138601314