ZUT - Polska Rama Kwalifikacji / Rok 2021/2022 / Wydział Ekonomiczny / Economics (S1) / Property Valuation and Real Estate Transactions / Sylabus przedmiotu

Wydział Ekonomiczny - Economics (S1)
specjalność: Property Valuation and Real Estate Transactions

Sylabus przedmiotu Ergonomics:

Informacje podstawowe

Kierunek studiów	Economics
Forma studiów	studia stacjonarne	Poziom	pierwszego stopnia
Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta	licencjat
Obszary studiów	charakterystyki PRK
Profil	ogólnoakademicki
Moduł	—
Przedmiot	Ergonomics
Specjalność	przedmiot wspólny
Jednostka prowadząca	Katedra Studiów Regionalnych i Europejskich
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny	Milena Bera <Milena.Bera@zut.edu.pl>
Inni nauczyciele
ECTS (planowane)	2,0	ECTS (formy)	2,0
Forma zaliczenia	zaliczenie	Język	polski
Blok obieralny	1	Grupa obieralna	1

Formy dydaktyczne

Forma dydaktyczna	KOD	Semestr	Godziny	ECTS	Waga	Zaliczenie
ćwiczenia audytoryjne	A	3	30	2,0	1,00	zaliczenie

Wymagania wstępne

KOD	Wymaganie wstępne
W-1	Selected aspects of knowledge in the field of microeconomics and management.

Cele przedmiotu

KOD	Cel modułu/przedmiotu
C-1	Obtaining the basics of knowledge about ergonomics. Mastering basic terms and conceptual categories.
C-2	Understanding the process of improving working conditions and improving the organization of workstations as an aspect of effective and modern management. Understanding the relationship between good workplace organization and work efficiency.
C-3	The ability to apply the assessment of the biological cost of work. Ability to assess workstations and factors that have a negative impact on work efficiency and knowledge of methods of diagnosing inefficiency of work organization.
C-4	he ability to formulate recommendations for improving the diagnosed disability of work organization and ways to reduce their effects.
C-5	Having knowledge about employer's obligations and health and safety at work requirements and the ability to combine them with ergonomics recommendations for proper and effective work organization.

Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć

KOD	Treść programowa	Godziny
ćwiczenia audytoryjne
T-A-1	Subject and scope of ergonomics. Layout: human - technical object - human environment as an object of ergonomics. Ergonomics as multidisciplinary knowledge. Concept and corrective ergonomics. Workplace with a screen monitor, ergonomics of office space.	3
T-A-2	Outline of knowledge about human work. Types of work.	2
T-A-3	The biological cost of work. Analysis of the work process. Physical effort at work. Static and dynamic load at work. Physiology of mental effort, its evaluation. Physical and mental fatigue. Monotype and monotony.	5
T-A-4	Material work environment as an element of the assessment of the biological labor cost: noise, vibration, microclimate, lighting, radiation and other hazards (chemical, biological). Impact on health, work safety and work efficiency. Hazards in the workplace and protection measures.	5
T-A-5	Organization of working time, breaks at work, shift work. Participation of physiology and occupational medicine in shaping working conditions.	2
T-A-6	Psychological factors of work organization. Signal perception. Sensory abilities of a human being, relations with the human nervous system. Visual communication (graphic symbols, codes, etc.) and voice.	2
T-A-7	Psychological stress at work: sources, threats, deficit / excess of information, time deficit.	4
T-A-8	Areas of interest in modern ergonomics.	2
T-A-9	Labour protection.	2
T-A-10	Methods and techniques of ergonomic evaluation of devices. Checklists. Ergonomic analysis for occupational risk assessment in the workplace.	3
		30

Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności

KOD	Forma aktywności	Godziny
ćwiczenia audytoryjne
A-A-1	Participation in classes.	30
A-A-2	Reading materials and literature on the subject.	12
A-A-3	Preparation of the final work or preparation for the test.	10
A-A-4	Consultation	6
A-A-5	Colloquium	2
		60

Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne

KOD	Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne
M-1	Explanatory methods (story, description, anecdote, explanation).
M-2	Problem methods (problem lecture, conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
M-3	Exposing methods (film, exhibition).
M-4	Programmed methods (using a computer, with the use of measuring equipment and teaching machines).
M-5	Practical methods (demonstration, subject exercises).

Sposoby oceny

KOD	Sposób oceny
S-1	Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
S-2	Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the work and test grades.

KOD

Sposób oceny

S-1

Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.

S-2

Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the work and test grades.

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia	Cel przedmiotu	Treści programowe	Metody nauczania	Sposób oceny
E_1A_O1/1_W01 Knowledge of psychophysical features constituting the ability to work.	E_1A_W05	—	C-1, C-2, C-3, C-5	T-A-2, T-A-3, T-A-6, T-A-7, T-A-1	M-1, M-2, M-5	S-1, S-2
E_1A_O1/1_W02 The student has knowledge of instruments affecting work efficiency.	E_1A_W10	—	C-2, C-3, C-4	T-A-3, T-A-4, T-A-5, T-A-8, T-A-10	M-2, M-4, M-5	S-1, S-2
E_1A_O1/1_W03 Knowledge in the field of human work as an element of entrepreneurship creation.	E_1A_W15	—	C-4, C-5	T-A-2, T-A-4, T-A-5, T-A-9	M-1, M-2	S-1, S-2

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia	Cel przedmiotu	Treści programowe	Metody nauczania	Sposób oceny
E_1A_O1/1_U01 Human resources management in such a way that at the lowest biological cost achieve the highest efficiency.	E_1A_U03, E_1A_U18	—	C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, C-5	T-A-3, T-A-4	M-1, M-2, M-5	S-1, S-2
E_1A_O1/1_U02 The student has the ability to apply standards for shaping the material work environment.	E_1A_U05	—	C-1, C-2, C-4, C-5	T-A-4, T-A-5, T-A-9	M-4, M-5	S-1, S-2

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia	Cel przedmiotu	Treści programowe	Metody nauczania	Sposób oceny
E_1A_O1/1_K01 Awareness of the needs and capabilities of their and subordinate employees influences the increase of managerial and organizational skills.	E_1A_K08	—	C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, C-5	T-A-2, T-A-3, T-A-5, T-A-6, T-A-7, T-A-8, T-A-1	M-1, M-2, M-3, M-4, M-5	S-1, S-2
E_1A_O1/1_K02 The student has competence in the humanization of the work process.	E_1A_K07	—	C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4	T-A-3, T-A-4, T-A-5, T-A-6, T-A-7, T-A-8	M-2, M-4, M-5	S-1, S-2

Kryterium oceny - wiedza

Efekt uczenia się	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
E_1A_O1/1_W01 Knowledge of psychophysical features constituting the ability to work.	2,0	Failure to pass, pass the work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
	3,0	The minimum level of completion of tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
	3,5	In general, correctly performed work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at about 60%.
	4,0	Well done work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at about 70%.
	4,5	Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a work or a test at the level of about 80%.
	5,0	Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.
E_1A_O1/1_W02 The student has knowledge of instruments affecting work efficiency.	2,0	The student is not able to: - define basic concepts of the subject, - indicate what is the subject literature and what is the goal, subject and the most important issues within the program, - sformułować krótkiej (nawet niepełnej), ale poprawnej wypowiedzi dla większości poruszanych na zajęciach obszarów tematycznych. Student otrzymuje ocenę niedostateczną, jeśli nie wykazuje zainteresowania treściami programowymi lub uchyla się od aktywności a jego absencja nie daje gwarancji nadrobienia zaległości w materialne.
	3,0	Student, for a satisfactory grade: - in the field of knowledge, he mastered and absorbed the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in the range of attitudes towards knowledge, the average interested (partially indifferent), - in the field of expressing knowledge, she commits many minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements is largely incorrect).
	3,5	Student, a satisfactory plus rating: - in the area of knowledge he mastered the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in terms of the ratio to the knowledge transferred, the average interest remains, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he makes minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements partly incorrect).
	4,0	Student, for a good grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered almost all programming material and knowledge acquired the basic content of the program almost exactly, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he almost completely mastered the entire scope of the material, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge, it shows interest, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he commits slight deficiencies (statements have slight errors).
	4,5	Student, for good plus grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the program material, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he mastered all program content, properly explains their meaning - shows interest in relation to knowledge, - speaks without difficulty using the substantive vocabulary.
	5,0	Student, for very good grade: - in terms of knowledge, it goes beyond the curriculum material, - demonstrates the understanding of knowledge without reservations to the course of reasoning, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a lot of interest and cognitive curiosity, can propose a context in which knowledge finds or can find practical application, - speaks a faultless language, properly substantive.
E_1A_O1/1_W03 Knowledge in the field of human work as an element of entrepreneurship creation.	2,0	Failure to pass, pass the work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
	3,0	The minimum level of completion of tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
	3,5	In general, correctly performed work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at about 60%.
	4,0	Well done work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at about 70%.
	4,5	Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a work or a test at the level of about 80%.
	5,0	Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.

Kryterium oceny - umiejętności

Efekt uczenia się	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
E_1A_O1/1_U01 Human resources management in such a way that at the lowest biological cost achieve the highest efficiency.	2,0	Failure to pass, pass the work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
	3,0	The minimum level of completion of tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
	3,5	In general, correctly performed work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at the level of approx. 60%.
	4,0	Well done work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at the level of about 70%.
	4,5	Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a work or a test at the level of about 80%.
	5,0	Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.
E_1A_O1/1_U02 The student has the ability to apply standards for shaping the material work environment.	2,0	The student can not identify and deal with the difficulties that may arise in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He can not apply practically acquired knowledge, he has basic problems with interpretation and inference.
	3,0	Student is able to identify and deal with a sufficient grade (with the help of a teacher or with the support of third parties) with selected difficulties related to the application of the acquired knowledge. He has very limited ability to put knowledge into practice and makes mistakes in non-primary tasks.
	3,5	The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus can identify and deal with, provided that additional support is obtained, with difficulties associated with the use of acquired knowledge. Has limited ability to apply knowledge in practice and makes mistakes in tasks in more difficult tasks.
	4,0	The student, on the good mark can identify and independently deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. Without errors, he applies the acquired knowledge to solve simple and medium-difficult tasks, makes mistakes in interpretation and inferring in more difficult contexts.
	4,5	The student, on the assessment of a good plus can independently identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He skilfully interprets and concludes in most contexts and tasks before him, understands the sense of mistakes and has the ability to improve.
	5,0	Student, on the very good assessment, independently identifies and solves the difficulties associated with the process of applying knowledge in practice. Flawlessly interprets and concludes, regardless of the level of difficulty of the issues in the subject matter. Expands your skills by combining the knowledge and skills you have previously acquired and searching for optimal solutions.

Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Efekt uczenia się	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
E_1A_O1/1_K01 Awareness of the needs and capabilities of their and subordinate employees influences the increase of managerial and organizational skills.	2,0	In the field of teamwork, the student is not able to plan and perform the work correctly and on time, does not report the need for assistance in consultations or despite this help does not achieve the minimum standards of performance.
	3,0	In the field of teamwork, the student plans and performs work in a clumsy way at each of its stages (preparatory, idea and project, executive, pre-presentation control and presentation itself).
	3,5	In the field of team work, the student is able to specify the goals of his own work and distributes or assists in discharging tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks. The student usually obtains a correct effect.
	4,0	In the field of team work, the student is able to specify the goals of his own work and distributes or assists in discharging tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks.
	4,5	In the field of teamwork, the student is able to independently plan, specify goals and actively participate in the distribution of tasks and their implementation at each stage of work.
	5,0	In the field of teamwork, the student: can independently plan, specify goals and distribute tasks by skills and control the situation of the project through proper motivation to act. The student demonstrates the timeliness and flawless way of presenting the results.
E_1A_O1/1_K02 The student has competence in the humanization of the work process.	2,0	Failure to pass, pass the work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
	3,0	The minimum level of completion of tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
	3,5	In general, correctly performed work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at about 60%.
	4,0	Well done work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at about 70%.
	4,5	Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a work or a test at the level of about 80%.
	5,0	Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.

Literatura podstawowa

Salvendy, Gavriel - Red., Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2006
Marras, William Steven - Red., The ergonomics of manual work : the proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association World Conference on Ergonomics of Materials Handling and Information Processing at Work, Washington Taylor & Francis, London, 1993

Treści programowe - ćwiczenia audytoryjne

KOD	Treść programowa	Godziny
T-A-1	Subject and scope of ergonomics. Layout: human - technical object - human environment as an object of ergonomics. Ergonomics as multidisciplinary knowledge. Concept and corrective ergonomics. Workplace with a screen monitor, ergonomics of office space.	3
T-A-2	Outline of knowledge about human work. Types of work.	2
T-A-3	The biological cost of work. Analysis of the work process. Physical effort at work. Static and dynamic load at work. Physiology of mental effort, its evaluation. Physical and mental fatigue. Monotype and monotony.	5
T-A-4	Material work environment as an element of the assessment of the biological labor cost: noise, vibration, microclimate, lighting, radiation and other hazards (chemical, biological). Impact on health, work safety and work efficiency. Hazards in the workplace and protection measures.	5
T-A-5	Organization of working time, breaks at work, shift work. Participation of physiology and occupational medicine in shaping working conditions.	2
T-A-6	Psychological factors of work organization. Signal perception. Sensory abilities of a human being, relations with the human nervous system. Visual communication (graphic symbols, codes, etc.) and voice.	2
T-A-7	Psychological stress at work: sources, threats, deficit / excess of information, time deficit.	4
T-A-8	Areas of interest in modern ergonomics.	2
T-A-9	Labour protection.	2
T-A-10	Methods and techniques of ergonomic evaluation of devices. Checklists. Ergonomic analysis for occupational risk assessment in the workplace.	3
		30

Formy aktywności - ćwiczenia audytoryjne

KOD	Forma aktywności	Godziny
A-A-1	Participation in classes.	30
A-A-2	Reading materials and literature on the subject.	12
A-A-3	Preparation of the final work or preparation for the test.	10
A-A-4	Consultation	6
A-A-5	Colloquium	2
		60

(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta

Pole	KOD	Znaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	E_1A_O1/1_W01	Knowledge of psychophysical features constituting the ability to work.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	E_1A_W05	Ma podstawową wiedzę o człowieku jako podmiocie tworzącym i działającym w strukturach społeczno-gospodarczych oraz zna prawidłowości związane z ich funkcjonowaniem
Cel przedmiotu	C-1	Obtaining the basics of knowledge about ergonomics. Mastering basic terms and conceptual categories.
	C-2	Understanding the process of improving working conditions and improving the organization of workstations as an aspect of effective and modern management. Understanding the relationship between good workplace organization and work efficiency.
	C-3	The ability to apply the assessment of the biological cost of work. Ability to assess workstations and factors that have a negative impact on work efficiency and knowledge of methods of diagnosing inefficiency of work organization.
	C-5	Having knowledge about employer's obligations and health and safety at work requirements and the ability to combine them with ergonomics recommendations for proper and effective work organization.
Treści programowe	T-A-2	Outline of knowledge about human work. Types of work.
	T-A-3	The biological cost of work. Analysis of the work process. Physical effort at work. Static and dynamic load at work. Physiology of mental effort, its evaluation. Physical and mental fatigue. Monotype and monotony.
	T-A-6	Psychological factors of work organization. Signal perception. Sensory abilities of a human being, relations with the human nervous system. Visual communication (graphic symbols, codes, etc.) and voice.
	T-A-7	Psychological stress at work: sources, threats, deficit / excess of information, time deficit.
	T-A-1	Subject and scope of ergonomics. Layout: human - technical object - human environment as an object of ergonomics. Ergonomics as multidisciplinary knowledge. Concept and corrective ergonomics. Workplace with a screen monitor, ergonomics of office space.
Metody nauczania	M-1	Explanatory methods (story, description, anecdote, explanation).
	M-2	Problem methods (problem lecture, conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
	M-5	Practical methods (demonstration, subject exercises).
Sposób oceny	S-1	Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
Sposób oceny	S-2	Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the work and test grades.
Kryteria oceny	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
	2,0	Failure to pass, pass the work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
	3,0	The minimum level of completion of tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
	3,5	In general, correctly performed work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at about 60%.
	4,0	Well done work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at about 70%.
	4,5	Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a work or a test at the level of about 80%.
	5,0	Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.

Pole	KOD	Znaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	E_1A_O1/1_W02	The student has knowledge of instruments affecting work efficiency.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	E_1A_W10	Zna podstawowe koncepcje i metody zarządzania procesami gospodarczymi i kapitałem ludzkim, rozumie powiązania między obszarami i funkcjami zarządzania w podmiotach społeczno-gospodarczych
Cel przedmiotu	C-2	Understanding the process of improving working conditions and improving the organization of workstations as an aspect of effective and modern management. Understanding the relationship between good workplace organization and work efficiency.
	C-3	The ability to apply the assessment of the biological cost of work. Ability to assess workstations and factors that have a negative impact on work efficiency and knowledge of methods of diagnosing inefficiency of work organization.
	C-4	he ability to formulate recommendations for improving the diagnosed disability of work organization and ways to reduce their effects.
Treści programowe	T-A-3	The biological cost of work. Analysis of the work process. Physical effort at work. Static and dynamic load at work. Physiology of mental effort, its evaluation. Physical and mental fatigue. Monotype and monotony.
	T-A-4	Material work environment as an element of the assessment of the biological labor cost: noise, vibration, microclimate, lighting, radiation and other hazards (chemical, biological). Impact on health, work safety and work efficiency. Hazards in the workplace and protection measures.
	T-A-5	Organization of working time, breaks at work, shift work. Participation of physiology and occupational medicine in shaping working conditions.
	T-A-8	Areas of interest in modern ergonomics.
	T-A-10	Methods and techniques of ergonomic evaluation of devices. Checklists. Ergonomic analysis for occupational risk assessment in the workplace.
Metody nauczania	M-2	Problem methods (problem lecture, conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
	M-4	Programmed methods (using a computer, with the use of measuring equipment and teaching machines).
	M-5	Practical methods (demonstration, subject exercises).
Sposób oceny	S-1	Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
Sposób oceny	S-2	Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the work and test grades.
Kryteria oceny	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
	2,0	The student is not able to: - define basic concepts of the subject, - indicate what is the subject literature and what is the goal, subject and the most important issues within the program, - sformułować krótkiej (nawet niepełnej), ale poprawnej wypowiedzi dla większości poruszanych na zajęciach obszarów tematycznych. Student otrzymuje ocenę niedostateczną, jeśli nie wykazuje zainteresowania treściami programowymi lub uchyla się od aktywności a jego absencja nie daje gwarancji nadrobienia zaległości w materialne.
	3,0	Student, for a satisfactory grade: - in the field of knowledge, he mastered and absorbed the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in the range of attitudes towards knowledge, the average interested (partially indifferent), - in the field of expressing knowledge, she commits many minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements is largely incorrect).
	3,5	Student, a satisfactory plus rating: - in the area of knowledge he mastered the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in terms of the ratio to the knowledge transferred, the average interest remains, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he makes minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements partly incorrect).
	4,0	Student, for a good grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered almost all programming material and knowledge acquired the basic content of the program almost exactly, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he almost completely mastered the entire scope of the material, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge, it shows interest, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he commits slight deficiencies (statements have slight errors).
	4,5	Student, for good plus grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the program material, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he mastered all program content, properly explains their meaning - shows interest in relation to knowledge, - speaks without difficulty using the substantive vocabulary.
	5,0	Student, for very good grade: - in terms of knowledge, it goes beyond the curriculum material, - demonstrates the understanding of knowledge without reservations to the course of reasoning, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a lot of interest and cognitive curiosity, can propose a context in which knowledge finds or can find practical application, - speaks a faultless language, properly substantive.

Pole	KOD	Znaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	E_1A_O1/1_W03	Knowledge in the field of human work as an element of entrepreneurship creation.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	E_1A_W15	Zna ogólne zasady tworzenia i rozwoju form indywidualnej przedsiębiorczości wykorzystującej wiedzę z zakresu ekonomii
Cel przedmiotu	C-4	he ability to formulate recommendations for improving the diagnosed disability of work organization and ways to reduce their effects.
Cel przedmiotu	C-5	Having knowledge about employer's obligations and health and safety at work requirements and the ability to combine them with ergonomics recommendations for proper and effective work organization.
Treści programowe	T-A-2	Outline of knowledge about human work. Types of work.
	T-A-4	Material work environment as an element of the assessment of the biological labor cost: noise, vibration, microclimate, lighting, radiation and other hazards (chemical, biological). Impact on health, work safety and work efficiency. Hazards in the workplace and protection measures.
	T-A-5	Organization of working time, breaks at work, shift work. Participation of physiology and occupational medicine in shaping working conditions.
	T-A-9	Labour protection.
Metody nauczania	M-1	Explanatory methods (story, description, anecdote, explanation).
Metody nauczania	M-2	Problem methods (problem lecture, conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
Sposób oceny	S-1	Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
Sposób oceny	S-2	Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the work and test grades.
Kryteria oceny	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
	2,0	Failure to pass, pass the work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
	3,0	The minimum level of completion of tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
	3,5	In general, correctly performed work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at about 60%.
	4,0	Well done work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at about 70%.
	4,5	Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a work or a test at the level of about 80%.
	5,0	Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.

Pole	KOD	Znaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	E_1A_O1/1_U01	Human resources management in such a way that at the lowest biological cost achieve the highest efficiency.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	E_1A_U03	Umie organizować pracę własną i zespołu
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	E_1A_U18	Potrafi oceniać swoje działania ze względu na ich skutki ekonomiczno-finansowe, prawne i moralne
Cel przedmiotu	C-1	Obtaining the basics of knowledge about ergonomics. Mastering basic terms and conceptual categories.
	C-2	Understanding the process of improving working conditions and improving the organization of workstations as an aspect of effective and modern management. Understanding the relationship between good workplace organization and work efficiency.
	C-3	The ability to apply the assessment of the biological cost of work. Ability to assess workstations and factors that have a negative impact on work efficiency and knowledge of methods of diagnosing inefficiency of work organization.
	C-4	he ability to formulate recommendations for improving the diagnosed disability of work organization and ways to reduce their effects.
	C-5	Having knowledge about employer's obligations and health and safety at work requirements and the ability to combine them with ergonomics recommendations for proper and effective work organization.
Treści programowe	T-A-3	The biological cost of work. Analysis of the work process. Physical effort at work. Static and dynamic load at work. Physiology of mental effort, its evaluation. Physical and mental fatigue. Monotype and monotony.
Treści programowe	T-A-4	Material work environment as an element of the assessment of the biological labor cost: noise, vibration, microclimate, lighting, radiation and other hazards (chemical, biological). Impact on health, work safety and work efficiency. Hazards in the workplace and protection measures.
Metody nauczania	M-1	Explanatory methods (story, description, anecdote, explanation).
	M-2	Problem methods (problem lecture, conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
	M-5	Practical methods (demonstration, subject exercises).
Sposób oceny	S-1	Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
Sposób oceny	S-2	Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the work and test grades.
Kryteria oceny	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
	2,0	Failure to pass, pass the work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
	3,0	The minimum level of completion of tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
	3,5	In general, correctly performed work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at the level of approx. 60%.
	4,0	Well done work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at the level of about 70%.
	4,5	Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a work or a test at the level of about 80%.
	5,0	Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.

Pole	KOD	Znaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	E_1A_O1/1_U02	The student has the ability to apply standards for shaping the material work environment.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	E_1A_U05	Prawidłowo posługuje się normami oraz regułami prawno-organizacyjnymi w celu rozwiązywania konkretnego zadania z zakresu ekonomii
Cel przedmiotu	C-1	Obtaining the basics of knowledge about ergonomics. Mastering basic terms and conceptual categories.
	C-2	Understanding the process of improving working conditions and improving the organization of workstations as an aspect of effective and modern management. Understanding the relationship between good workplace organization and work efficiency.
	C-4	he ability to formulate recommendations for improving the diagnosed disability of work organization and ways to reduce their effects.
	C-5	Having knowledge about employer's obligations and health and safety at work requirements and the ability to combine them with ergonomics recommendations for proper and effective work organization.
Treści programowe	T-A-4	Material work environment as an element of the assessment of the biological labor cost: noise, vibration, microclimate, lighting, radiation and other hazards (chemical, biological). Impact on health, work safety and work efficiency. Hazards in the workplace and protection measures.
	T-A-5	Organization of working time, breaks at work, shift work. Participation of physiology and occupational medicine in shaping working conditions.
	T-A-9	Labour protection.
Metody nauczania	M-4	Programmed methods (using a computer, with the use of measuring equipment and teaching machines).
Metody nauczania	M-5	Practical methods (demonstration, subject exercises).
Sposób oceny	S-1	Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
Sposób oceny	S-2	Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the work and test grades.
Kryteria oceny	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
	2,0	The student can not identify and deal with the difficulties that may arise in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He can not apply practically acquired knowledge, he has basic problems with interpretation and inference.
	3,0	Student is able to identify and deal with a sufficient grade (with the help of a teacher or with the support of third parties) with selected difficulties related to the application of the acquired knowledge. He has very limited ability to put knowledge into practice and makes mistakes in non-primary tasks.
	3,5	The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus can identify and deal with, provided that additional support is obtained, with difficulties associated with the use of acquired knowledge. Has limited ability to apply knowledge in practice and makes mistakes in tasks in more difficult tasks.
	4,0	The student, on the good mark can identify and independently deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. Without errors, he applies the acquired knowledge to solve simple and medium-difficult tasks, makes mistakes in interpretation and inferring in more difficult contexts.
	4,5	The student, on the assessment of a good plus can independently identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He skilfully interprets and concludes in most contexts and tasks before him, understands the sense of mistakes and has the ability to improve.
	5,0	Student, on the very good assessment, independently identifies and solves the difficulties associated with the process of applying knowledge in practice. Flawlessly interprets and concludes, regardless of the level of difficulty of the issues in the subject matter. Expands your skills by combining the knowledge and skills you have previously acquired and searching for optimal solutions.

Pole	KOD	Znaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	E_1A_O1/1_K01	Awareness of the needs and capabilities of their and subordinate employees influences the increase of managerial and organizational skills.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	E_1A_K08	Podejmowania odpowiedzialności za swoje zadania oraz zespołu, którym kieruje
Cel przedmiotu	C-1	Obtaining the basics of knowledge about ergonomics. Mastering basic terms and conceptual categories.
	C-2	Understanding the process of improving working conditions and improving the organization of workstations as an aspect of effective and modern management. Understanding the relationship between good workplace organization and work efficiency.
	C-3	The ability to apply the assessment of the biological cost of work. Ability to assess workstations and factors that have a negative impact on work efficiency and knowledge of methods of diagnosing inefficiency of work organization.
	C-4	he ability to formulate recommendations for improving the diagnosed disability of work organization and ways to reduce their effects.
	C-5	Having knowledge about employer's obligations and health and safety at work requirements and the ability to combine them with ergonomics recommendations for proper and effective work organization.
Treści programowe	T-A-2	Outline of knowledge about human work. Types of work.
	T-A-3	The biological cost of work. Analysis of the work process. Physical effort at work. Static and dynamic load at work. Physiology of mental effort, its evaluation. Physical and mental fatigue. Monotype and monotony.
	T-A-5	Organization of working time, breaks at work, shift work. Participation of physiology and occupational medicine in shaping working conditions.
	T-A-6	Psychological factors of work organization. Signal perception. Sensory abilities of a human being, relations with the human nervous system. Visual communication (graphic symbols, codes, etc.) and voice.
	T-A-7	Psychological stress at work: sources, threats, deficit / excess of information, time deficit.
	T-A-8	Areas of interest in modern ergonomics.
	T-A-1	Subject and scope of ergonomics. Layout: human - technical object - human environment as an object of ergonomics. Ergonomics as multidisciplinary knowledge. Concept and corrective ergonomics. Workplace with a screen monitor, ergonomics of office space.
Metody nauczania	M-1	Explanatory methods (story, description, anecdote, explanation).
	M-2	Problem methods (problem lecture, conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
	M-3	Exposing methods (film, exhibition).
	M-4	Programmed methods (using a computer, with the use of measuring equipment and teaching machines).
	M-5	Practical methods (demonstration, subject exercises).
Sposób oceny	S-1	Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
Sposób oceny	S-2	Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the work and test grades.
Kryteria oceny	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
	2,0	In the field of teamwork, the student is not able to plan and perform the work correctly and on time, does not report the need for assistance in consultations or despite this help does not achieve the minimum standards of performance.
	3,0	In the field of teamwork, the student plans and performs work in a clumsy way at each of its stages (preparatory, idea and project, executive, pre-presentation control and presentation itself).
	3,5	In the field of team work, the student is able to specify the goals of his own work and distributes or assists in discharging tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks. The student usually obtains a correct effect.
	4,0	In the field of team work, the student is able to specify the goals of his own work and distributes or assists in discharging tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks.
	4,5	In the field of teamwork, the student is able to independently plan, specify goals and actively participate in the distribution of tasks and their implementation at each stage of work.
	5,0	In the field of teamwork, the student: can independently plan, specify goals and distribute tasks by skills and control the situation of the project through proper motivation to act. The student demonstrates the timeliness and flawless way of presenting the results.

Pole	KOD	Znaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	E_1A_O1/1_K02	The student has competence in the humanization of the work process.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	E_1A_K07	Skutecznej realizacji postawionych zadań z jednoczesnym uwzględnieniem zasad etycznych
Cel przedmiotu	C-1	Obtaining the basics of knowledge about ergonomics. Mastering basic terms and conceptual categories.
	C-2	Understanding the process of improving working conditions and improving the organization of workstations as an aspect of effective and modern management. Understanding the relationship between good workplace organization and work efficiency.
	C-3	The ability to apply the assessment of the biological cost of work. Ability to assess workstations and factors that have a negative impact on work efficiency and knowledge of methods of diagnosing inefficiency of work organization.
	C-4	he ability to formulate recommendations for improving the diagnosed disability of work organization and ways to reduce their effects.
Treści programowe	T-A-3	The biological cost of work. Analysis of the work process. Physical effort at work. Static and dynamic load at work. Physiology of mental effort, its evaluation. Physical and mental fatigue. Monotype and monotony.
	T-A-4	Material work environment as an element of the assessment of the biological labor cost: noise, vibration, microclimate, lighting, radiation and other hazards (chemical, biological). Impact on health, work safety and work efficiency. Hazards in the workplace and protection measures.
	T-A-5	Organization of working time, breaks at work, shift work. Participation of physiology and occupational medicine in shaping working conditions.
	T-A-6	Psychological factors of work organization. Signal perception. Sensory abilities of a human being, relations with the human nervous system. Visual communication (graphic symbols, codes, etc.) and voice.
	T-A-7	Psychological stress at work: sources, threats, deficit / excess of information, time deficit.
	T-A-8	Areas of interest in modern ergonomics.
Metody nauczania	M-2	Problem methods (problem lecture, conversational lecture, case method, didactic discussion).
	M-4	Programmed methods (using a computer, with the use of measuring equipment and teaching machines).
	M-5	Practical methods (demonstration, subject exercises).
Sposób oceny	S-1	Ocena formująca: Correct answers to the testing questions asked during the course are rewarded as activity and raise the final grade.
Sposób oceny	S-2	Ocena podsumowująca: Final test or work according to the previously explained scheme. The type of credit is announced at the first class and remains unchanged. If the pass is a work, then the test is used only for people whose work has been rated below 3.5 and constitutes an additional element checking knowledge and skills and the final mark for such people is the average of the work and test grades.
Kryteria oceny	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
	2,0	Failure to pass, pass the work not on the subject, after the deadline, contrary to the recommendations given or a test with less than 50% of the number of answers.
	3,0	The minimum level of completion of tasks, with many formal or substantive errors or a test at the level above 50%.
	3,5	In general, correctly performed work with minor factual and formal errors or a test at about 60%.
	4,0	Well done work, conclusions may contain minor errors, or a test at about 70%.
	4,5	Correct and without errors, with correct conclusions, a work or a test at the level of about 80%.
	5,0	Very well performed work, without errors, containing all the required elements and correct substantive analysis as well as conclusions or a test at the level of approx. 90%.