Szkoła Doktorska - ZUT Doctoral School
Sylabus przedmiotu Research grants and research project management:
Informacje podstawowe
| Kierunek studiów | ZUT Doctoral School | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forma studiów | studia stacjonarne | Poziom | |
| Stopnień naukowy absolwenta | doktor | ||
| Obszary studiów | charakterystyki PRK | ||
| Profil | |||
| Moduł | — | ||
| Przedmiot | Research grants and research project management | ||
| Specjalność | przedmiot wspólny | ||
| Jednostka prowadząca | Katedra Technologii Chemicznej Nieorganicznej i Inżynierii Środowiska | ||
| Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny | Sylwia Mozia <Sylwia.Mozia@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| Inni nauczyciele | |||
| ECTS (planowane) | 2,0 | ECTS (formy) | 2,0 |
| Forma zaliczenia | zaliczenie | Język | polski |
| Blok obieralny | — | Grupa obieralna | — |
Formy dydaktyczne
Wymagania wstępne
| KOD | Wymaganie wstępne |
|---|---|
| W-1 | None |
Cele przedmiotu
| KOD | Cel modułu/przedmiotu |
|---|---|
| C-1 | PhD student will get knowledge on the types of grants and research projects, the rules of preparation of project applications and the main challenges during realization of research grants. |
| C-2 | PhD student will get knowledge on the main rules of preparation of the selected parts of research project proposal. He/she will get skills necessary for preparation of the grant application. |
Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć
| KOD | Treść programowa | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| projekty | ||
| T-P-1 | Preparation of exemplary grant application: project concept, literature review, research achievements of Principal Investigator (PI), project description, budget, risk analysis, data Management Plan (DMP). | 12 |
| 12 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| T-W-1 | Searching for sources of research funding - institutions supporting research in Poland and abroad. Types of research grants. Planning and writing a grant proposal. Data Management Plan (DMP). Evaluation of project proposal - how to improve the rejected application? Project realization - what to pay attention to? Reports on project realization. Dissemination of project results. Good practice in research and research integrity. | 9 |
| 9 | ||
Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności
| KOD | Forma aktywności | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| projekty | ||
| A-P-1 | participation in classes | 12 |
| A-P-2 | work at home (writing selected parts of grant application) | 18 |
| 30 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| A-W-1 | participation in lectures | 9 |
| A-W-2 | work at home (literature review) | 21 |
| 30 | ||
Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne
| KOD | Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne |
|---|---|
| M-1 | lecture |
| M-2 | project |
Sposoby oceny
| KOD | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|
| S-1 | Ocena podsumowująca: Lecture Evaluation of knowledge and skills of PhD student gathered during lectures. Oral assignment. |
| S-2 | Ocena podsumowująca: Project Evaluation of knowledge and skills of PhD student gathered during project classes. Assignment based on preparation of selected parts of exemplary grant application. |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscypliny | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISDE_4-_B04_W01 PhD student knows: - selected institutions financing research in Poland and abroad, - types of grants and research projects, - rules for preparation of grant applications, - rules for preparation of reports on research project realization, - methods for dissemination of project results. | ISDE_4-_W05, ISDE_4-_W04, ISDE_4-_W07 | — | C-1, C-2 | T-W-1, T-P-1 | M-1, M-2 | S-1, S-2 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscypliny | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISDE_4-_B04_U01 PhD student is able to (i) find sources of financial support of research and (ii) prepare grant application. | ISDE_4-_U01, ISDE_4-_U03, ISDE_4-_U06 | — | C-1, C-2 | T-W-1, T-P-1 | M-1, M-2 | S-1, S-2 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscypliny | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISDE_4-_B04_K01 PhD student understands the need of a critical analysis of scientific achievements and the evaluation of his/her scientific contribution to the development of science, especially with reference to preparation and realization of research projects and grants. He/she understands the duty of initiation of actions for public benefit and creative searching for answers to civilization challenges , e.g. via realization of research projects. He/she understands the need to comply with ethical and legal norms in research. | ISDE_4-_K01, ISDE_4-_K02, ISDE_4-_K03, ISDE_4-_K04, ISDE_4-_K05 | — | C-1, C-2 | T-W-1, T-P-1 | M-1, M-2 | S-1, S-2 |
Kryterium oceny - wiedza
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| ISDE_4-_B04_W01 PhD student knows: - selected institutions financing research in Poland and abroad, - types of grants and research projects, - rules for preparation of grant applications, - rules for preparation of reports on research project realization, - methods for dissemination of project results. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | Required at least 60% of correct answers | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 |
Kryterium oceny - umiejętności
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| ISDE_4-_B04_U01 PhD student is able to (i) find sources of financial support of research and (ii) prepare grant application. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | Required at least 60% of correct answers | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 |
Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| ISDE_4-_B04_K01 PhD student understands the need of a critical analysis of scientific achievements and the evaluation of his/her scientific contribution to the development of science, especially with reference to preparation and realization of research projects and grants. He/she understands the duty of initiation of actions for public benefit and creative searching for answers to civilization challenges , e.g. via realization of research projects. He/she understands the need to comply with ethical and legal norms in research. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | Required at least 60% of correct answers | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 |
Literatura podstawowa
- The Code of the National Science Centre on Research Integrity and Applying for Research Financing, National Science Centre, www.ncn.gov.pl
- K Sudheesh, Devika Rani Duggappa, SS Nethra, How to write a research proposal?, Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2016, 60(9), 631–634
- Besim Nebiu, Project Proposal Writing, The Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe, Hungary, 2002
- Maree Stenglin, Chris Cléirigh, Scientific grant application writing: Re/packaging text to enhance its impact, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2020, 100823