ZUT - Polska Rama Kwalifikacji / Rok 2023/2024 / Wydział Ekonomiczny / Economics (S1) / Sylabus przedmiotu

Wydział Ekonomiczny - Economics (S1)

Sylabus przedmiotu Economic and environmental consulting:

Informacje podstawowe

Kierunek studiów	Economics
Forma studiów	studia stacjonarne	Poziom	pierwszego stopnia
Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta	licencjat
Obszary studiów	charakterystyki PRK
Profil	ogólnoakademicki
Moduł	—
Przedmiot	Economic and environmental consulting
Specjalność	przedmiot wspólny
Jednostka prowadząca	Katedra Nieruchomości
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny	Aneta Zaremba <Aneta.Zaremba@zut.edu.pl>
Inni nauczyciele	Teodor Skotarczak <Teodor.Skotarczak@zut.edu.pl>
ECTS (planowane)	2,0	ECTS (formy)	2,0
Forma zaliczenia	zaliczenie	Język	polski
Blok obieralny	—	Grupa obieralna	—

Formy dydaktyczne

Forma dydaktyczna	KOD	Semestr	Godziny	ECTS	Waga	Zaliczenie
wykłady	W	6	10	1,0	0,50	zaliczenie
konwersatoria	K	6	15	1,0	0,50	zaliczenie

Wymagania wstępne

KOD	Wymaganie wstępne
W-1	Selected aspects of knowledge in the field of microeconomics and management.

Cele przedmiotu

KOD	Cel modułu/przedmiotu
C-1	Preparing students to self-write a plan of a consulting nature for farms, especially in the economic aspect.

Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć

KOD	Treść programowa	Godziny
konwersatoria
T-K-1	Consulting as a social and professional activity on the example of an agricultural enterprise	3
T-K-2	Entrepreneurship and innovation in rural areas - environmental aspect	3
T-K-3	Selected problems with the agricultural advisor profession. The adviser's profile and preparation of the candidate for the agricultural adviser profession, personality traits, the principles of the adviser's effective operation, professional adviser's ethics	3
T-K-4	Interpersonal communication in environmental consulting. Model of the interpersonal communication process, communication as a social action	3
T-K-5	Problems of the agricultural population as a subject of environmental consulting, proper identification of environmental and economic problems	2
T-K-6	Final tests	1
		15
wykłady
T-W-1	Basics of environmental consulting in the economic aspect.	2
T-W-2	Implementation of agri-environmental programs in the European Union	3
T-W-3	Environmental consulting in the activity of agricultural enterprises. Case Study.	2
T-W-4	Procedures for solving problems regarding environmental requirements in rural areas.	2
T-W-5	Final tests	1
		10

Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności

KOD	Forma aktywności	Godziny
konwersatoria
A-K-1	Participation in classes	15
A-K-2	Preparation for classes, including problem solving	5
A-K-3	Preparation for final tests	5
		25
wykłady
A-W-1	Participation in lectures	10
A-W-2	Preparation for lectures - studying the literature of the subject	8
A-W-3	Preparation for final tests	7
		25

Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne

KOD	Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne
M-1	Information lecture
M-2	Problem lecture
M-3	Conversational lecture
M-4	Exercises

Sposoby oceny

KOD	Sposób oceny
S-1	Ocena formująca: Assessment of student's achievements by asking questions in writing and orally during the course
S-2	Ocena formująca: Analysis and assessment of students' activity during classes
S-3	Ocena podsumowująca: Final test in writing, covering issues and discussed in the course of seminars
S-4	Ocena podsumowująca: Credits in writing including questions about lectures

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia	Cel przedmiotu	Treści programowe	Metody nauczania	Sposób oceny
Ec_1A_C19_W01 The student knows and understands the economic aspect of environmental consulting	Ec_1A_W01, Ec_1A_W04, Ec_1A_W07	—	C-1	T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-4, T-W-3	M-1, M-2, M-3, M-4	S-1, S-3, S-2, S-4

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia	Cel przedmiotu	Treści programowe	Metody nauczania	Sposób oceny
Ec_1A_C19_U01 student has the ability to use the acquired economic knowledge to analyze economic issues related to the activities of agricultural enterprises.	Ec_1A_U01, Ec_1A_U02, Ec_1A_U03	—	C-1	T-K-5, T-K-3, T-K-1, T-K-2, T-K-4	M-1, M-2, M-3, M-4	S-1, S-3, S-2, S-4

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia	Cel przedmiotu	Treści programowe	Metody nauczania	Sposób oceny
Ec_1A_C19_K01 The student is ready to think and act in an entrepreneurial way as part of the implementation and execution of environmental consulting procedures.	Ec_1A_K01, Ec_1A_K02, Ec_1A_K03	—	C-1	T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-4, T-W-3, T-K-5, T-K-3, T-K-1, T-K-2, T-K-4	M-1, M-2, M-3, M-4	S-1, S-3, S-2, S-4

Kryterium oceny - wiedza

Efekt uczenia się	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
Ec_1A_C19_W01 The student knows and understands the economic aspect of environmental consulting	2,0	The student has no basic knowledge of the subject, which prevents him from showing competence. He presents wrong views and opinions, even in the situation of hints, he can not present competences in correct inference and interpretation skills. It reveals the lack of commitment and the lack of willingness to do the job in a proper way. In the field of teamwork, the student: can not plan and execute work correctly and on time, does not report the need for assistance in consultations or, despite this help, does not achieve the minimum standards of performance.
	3,0	The student, on the satisfactory grade, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, with numerous errors not fully qualifying. In the field of team work, the student: plans and performs work in a clumsy way at each of its stages (preparatory, idea and project, executive, pre-presentation control and presentation itself).
	3,5	The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus shows skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, is able to plan the performance of the work and reveals the ability to complete the basic scope of the plan. He makes mistakes, but he usually carries out key areas correctly. In the field of teamwork, the student: can specify the goals of his own work and distribute or help in the distribution of tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks. Generally, it has the correct effect.
	4,0	The student, on the good mark, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the subject matter and the basic skills for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills. In the field of teamwork, the student: can specify the goals of his own work and distribute or help in the distribution of tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks.
	4,5	The student, on the good grade plus, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the key subject of the subject and the possibilities and abilities for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills. In the field of teamwork, the student: can independently plan, specify goals and actively participate in the distribution of tasks and their implementation at each stage of work.
	5,0	The student, on the very good note, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of subject matter and the possibilities and the ability to use the acquired knowledge and skills in the future. In the field of teamwork, the student: can independently plan, specify goals and distribute tasks by skills and control the situation of the project through proper motivation to act. It demonstrates the timeliness and flawless presentation of results.

Kryterium oceny - umiejętności

Efekt uczenia się	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
Ec_1A_C19_U01 student has the ability to use the acquired economic knowledge to analyze economic issues related to the activities of agricultural enterprises.	2,0	He can not identify and cope alone with the difficulties that may arise in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He can not apply practically acquired knowledge, he has basic problems with interpretation and inference.
	3,0	Student is able to identify and deal with a sufficient grade (with the help of a teacher or with the support of third parties) with selected difficulties related to the application of the acquired knowledge. He has very limited ability to put knowledge into practice and makes mistakes in non-primary tasks.
	3,5	The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus can identify and deal with, provided that additional support is obtained, with difficulties associated with the use of acquired knowledge. Has limited ability to apply knowledge in practice and makes mistakes in tasks in more difficult tasks.
	4,0	The student, on the good mark can identify and independently deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. Without errors, he applies the acquired knowledge to solve simple and medium-difficult tasks, makes mistakes in interpretation and inferring in more difficult contexts.
	4,5	The student, on the assessment of a good plus can independently identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He skilfully interprets and concludes in most contexts and tasks before him, understands the sense of mistakes and has the ability to improve.
	5,0	Student, on the very good assessment, independently identifies and solves the difficulties associated with the process of applying knowledge in practice. Flawlessly interprets and concludes, regardless of the level of difficulty of the issues in the subject matter. Expands your skills by combining the knowledge and skills you have previously acquired and searching for optimal solutions.

Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Efekt uczenia się	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
Ec_1A_C19_K01 The student is ready to think and act in an entrepreneurial way as part of the implementation and execution of environmental consulting procedures.	2,0	The student has no basic knowledge of the subject, which prevents him from showing competence. He presents wrong views and opinions, even in the situation of hints, he can not present competences in correct inference and interpretation skills. It reveals the lack of commitment and the lack of willingness to do the job in a proper way.
	3,0	The student, on the satisfactory grade, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, with numerous errors not fully qualifying. In the field of team work, the student: plans and performs work in a clumsy way at each of its stages (preparatory, idea and project, executive, pre-presentation control and presentation itself).
	3,5	The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus shows skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, is able to plan the performance of the work and reveals the ability to complete the basic scope of the plan. He makes mistakes, but he usually carries out key areas correctly.
	4,0	The student, on the good mark, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the subject matter and the basic skills for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
	4,5	The student, on the good grade plus, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the key subject of the subject and the possibilities and abilities for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
	5,0	The student, on the very good note, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of subject matter and the possibilities and the ability to use the acquired knowledge and skills in the future.

Literatura podstawowa

B.A. Babcock, R.W. Fraser, J.N. Lekakis, Risk Management and the Environment: Agriculture in Perspective Paperback – Import, Springer Science & Business Media, 2010
Laura Vivian, Environment and Agriculture: Perspectives on Sustainability, Syrawood Publishing House, 2016
Wortmann D., Von der Vision zur strategie: Grundelmente Und Entwicklungsmuster einer politik der Nachhaltichkeit, [w:] Sustainable Development – Utopie oder realistische Vision?, Hamburg, 2002

Literatura dodatkowa

Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh, Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1996

Treści programowe - konwersatoria

KOD	Treść programowa	Godziny
T-K-1	Consulting as a social and professional activity on the example of an agricultural enterprise	3
T-K-2	Entrepreneurship and innovation in rural areas - environmental aspect	3
T-K-3	Selected problems with the agricultural advisor profession. The adviser's profile and preparation of the candidate for the agricultural adviser profession, personality traits, the principles of the adviser's effective operation, professional adviser's ethics	3
T-K-4	Interpersonal communication in environmental consulting. Model of the interpersonal communication process, communication as a social action	3
T-K-5	Problems of the agricultural population as a subject of environmental consulting, proper identification of environmental and economic problems	2
T-K-6	Final tests	1
		15

Treści programowe - wykłady

KOD	Treść programowa	Godziny
T-W-1	Basics of environmental consulting in the economic aspect.	2
T-W-2	Implementation of agri-environmental programs in the European Union	3
T-W-3	Environmental consulting in the activity of agricultural enterprises. Case Study.	2
T-W-4	Procedures for solving problems regarding environmental requirements in rural areas.	2
T-W-5	Final tests	1
		10

Formy aktywności - konwersatoria

KOD	Forma aktywności	Godziny
A-K-1	Participation in classes	15
A-K-2	Preparation for classes, including problem solving	5
A-K-3	Preparation for final tests	5
		25

(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta

Formy aktywności - wykłady

KOD	Forma aktywności	Godziny
A-W-1	Participation in lectures	10
A-W-2	Preparation for lectures - studying the literature of the subject	8
A-W-3	Preparation for final tests	7
		25

(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta

Pole	KOD	Znaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	Ec_1A_C19_W01	The student knows and understands the economic aspect of environmental consulting
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	Ec_1A_W01	He / she knows and understands at an advanced level economic and social facts and phenomena as well as theories explaining the complex relationships between them constituting the basic general knowledge in the discipline of economics and finance, as well as selected issues in the field of detailed knowledge
	Ec_1A_W04	He / she knows and understands at an advanced level the forms of social institutions (public, cultural, political, legal, economic), their structures, as well as the relationships between them on a national and international scale
	Ec_1A_W07	He / she knows and understands the fundamental economic and social dilemmas of modern civilisation, including the economy
Cel przedmiotu	C-1	Preparing students to self-write a plan of a consulting nature for farms, especially in the economic aspect.
Treści programowe	T-W-1	Basics of environmental consulting in the economic aspect.
	T-W-2	Implementation of agri-environmental programs in the European Union
	T-W-4	Procedures for solving problems regarding environmental requirements in rural areas.
	T-W-3	Environmental consulting in the activity of agricultural enterprises. Case Study.
Metody nauczania	M-1	Information lecture
	M-2	Problem lecture
	M-3	Conversational lecture
	M-4	Exercises
Sposób oceny	S-1	Ocena formująca: Assessment of student's achievements by asking questions in writing and orally during the course
	S-3	Ocena podsumowująca: Final test in writing, covering issues and discussed in the course of seminars
	S-2	Ocena formująca: Analysis and assessment of students' activity during classes
	S-4	Ocena podsumowująca: Credits in writing including questions about lectures
Kryteria oceny	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
	2,0	The student has no basic knowledge of the subject, which prevents him from showing competence. He presents wrong views and opinions, even in the situation of hints, he can not present competences in correct inference and interpretation skills. It reveals the lack of commitment and the lack of willingness to do the job in a proper way. In the field of teamwork, the student: can not plan and execute work correctly and on time, does not report the need for assistance in consultations or, despite this help, does not achieve the minimum standards of performance.
	3,0	The student, on the satisfactory grade, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, with numerous errors not fully qualifying. In the field of team work, the student: plans and performs work in a clumsy way at each of its stages (preparatory, idea and project, executive, pre-presentation control and presentation itself).
	3,5	The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus shows skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, is able to plan the performance of the work and reveals the ability to complete the basic scope of the plan. He makes mistakes, but he usually carries out key areas correctly. In the field of teamwork, the student: can specify the goals of his own work and distribute or help in the distribution of tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks. Generally, it has the correct effect.
	4,0	The student, on the good mark, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the subject matter and the basic skills for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills. In the field of teamwork, the student: can specify the goals of his own work and distribute or help in the distribution of tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks.
	4,5	The student, on the good grade plus, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the key subject of the subject and the possibilities and abilities for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills. In the field of teamwork, the student: can independently plan, specify goals and actively participate in the distribution of tasks and their implementation at each stage of work.
	5,0	The student, on the very good note, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of subject matter and the possibilities and the ability to use the acquired knowledge and skills in the future. In the field of teamwork, the student: can independently plan, specify goals and distribute tasks by skills and control the situation of the project through proper motivation to act. It demonstrates the timeliness and flawless presentation of results.

Pole	KOD	Znaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	Ec_1A_C19_U01	student has the ability to use the acquired economic knowledge to analyze economic issues related to the activities of agricultural enterprises.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	Ec_1A_U01	He / she can use knowledge to identify and interpret socio-economic processes and phenomena with the use of methods and tools appropriate for economics
	Ec_1A_U02	He / she can apply knowledge to formulate and solve complex and unusual problems concerning socio-economic processes and phenomena in the micro-, meso- and macro-scale
	Ec_1A_U03	He / she is able to solve tasks and problems in conditions that are not fully predictable, properly selecting sources and information from them, making their evaluation, making a critical analysis of them and synthesising them
Cel przedmiotu	C-1	Preparing students to self-write a plan of a consulting nature for farms, especially in the economic aspect.
Treści programowe	T-K-5	Problems of the agricultural population as a subject of environmental consulting, proper identification of environmental and economic problems
	T-K-3	Selected problems with the agricultural advisor profession. The adviser's profile and preparation of the candidate for the agricultural adviser profession, personality traits, the principles of the adviser's effective operation, professional adviser's ethics
	T-K-1	Consulting as a social and professional activity on the example of an agricultural enterprise
	T-K-2	Entrepreneurship and innovation in rural areas - environmental aspect
	T-K-4	Interpersonal communication in environmental consulting. Model of the interpersonal communication process, communication as a social action
Metody nauczania	M-1	Information lecture
	M-2	Problem lecture
	M-3	Conversational lecture
	M-4	Exercises
Sposób oceny	S-1	Ocena formująca: Assessment of student's achievements by asking questions in writing and orally during the course
	S-3	Ocena podsumowująca: Final test in writing, covering issues and discussed in the course of seminars
	S-2	Ocena formująca: Analysis and assessment of students' activity during classes
	S-4	Ocena podsumowująca: Credits in writing including questions about lectures
Kryteria oceny	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
	2,0	He can not identify and cope alone with the difficulties that may arise in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He can not apply practically acquired knowledge, he has basic problems with interpretation and inference.
	3,0	Student is able to identify and deal with a sufficient grade (with the help of a teacher or with the support of third parties) with selected difficulties related to the application of the acquired knowledge. He has very limited ability to put knowledge into practice and makes mistakes in non-primary tasks.
	3,5	The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus can identify and deal with, provided that additional support is obtained, with difficulties associated with the use of acquired knowledge. Has limited ability to apply knowledge in practice and makes mistakes in tasks in more difficult tasks.
	4,0	The student, on the good mark can identify and independently deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. Without errors, he applies the acquired knowledge to solve simple and medium-difficult tasks, makes mistakes in interpretation and inferring in more difficult contexts.
	4,5	The student, on the assessment of a good plus can independently identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He skilfully interprets and concludes in most contexts and tasks before him, understands the sense of mistakes and has the ability to improve.
	5,0	Student, on the very good assessment, independently identifies and solves the difficulties associated with the process of applying knowledge in practice. Flawlessly interprets and concludes, regardless of the level of difficulty of the issues in the subject matter. Expands your skills by combining the knowledge and skills you have previously acquired and searching for optimal solutions.

Pole	KOD	Znaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się	Ec_1A_C19_K01	The student is ready to think and act in an entrepreneurial way as part of the implementation and execution of environmental consulting procedures.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów	Ec_1A_K01	He / she is ready to critically assess the possessed knowledge, skills and received content, to recognise the importance of knowledge in solving cognitive and practical problems, and is aware of the need to consult experts in case of difficulties with solving the problem on his / her own
	Ec_1A_K02	He / she is ready to fulfil social obligations, co-organise projects for the social environment, as well as initiate activities for the public interest
	Ec_1A_K03	He / she is ready to think and act in an entrepreneurial way
Cel przedmiotu	C-1	Preparing students to self-write a plan of a consulting nature for farms, especially in the economic aspect.
Treści programowe	T-W-1	Basics of environmental consulting in the economic aspect.
	T-W-2	Implementation of agri-environmental programs in the European Union
	T-W-4	Procedures for solving problems regarding environmental requirements in rural areas.
	T-W-3	Environmental consulting in the activity of agricultural enterprises. Case Study.
	T-K-5	Problems of the agricultural population as a subject of environmental consulting, proper identification of environmental and economic problems
	T-K-3	Selected problems with the agricultural advisor profession. The adviser's profile and preparation of the candidate for the agricultural adviser profession, personality traits, the principles of the adviser's effective operation, professional adviser's ethics
	T-K-1	Consulting as a social and professional activity on the example of an agricultural enterprise
	T-K-2	Entrepreneurship and innovation in rural areas - environmental aspect
	T-K-4	Interpersonal communication in environmental consulting. Model of the interpersonal communication process, communication as a social action
Metody nauczania	M-1	Information lecture
	M-2	Problem lecture
	M-3	Conversational lecture
	M-4	Exercises
Sposób oceny	S-1	Ocena formująca: Assessment of student's achievements by asking questions in writing and orally during the course
	S-3	Ocena podsumowująca: Final test in writing, covering issues and discussed in the course of seminars
	S-2	Ocena formująca: Analysis and assessment of students' activity during classes
	S-4	Ocena podsumowująca: Credits in writing including questions about lectures
Kryteria oceny	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
	2,0	The student has no basic knowledge of the subject, which prevents him from showing competence. He presents wrong views and opinions, even in the situation of hints, he can not present competences in correct inference and interpretation skills. It reveals the lack of commitment and the lack of willingness to do the job in a proper way.
	3,0	The student, on the satisfactory grade, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, with numerous errors not fully qualifying. In the field of team work, the student: plans and performs work in a clumsy way at each of its stages (preparatory, idea and project, executive, pre-presentation control and presentation itself).
	3,5	The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus shows skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, is able to plan the performance of the work and reveals the ability to complete the basic scope of the plan. He makes mistakes, but he usually carries out key areas correctly.
	4,0	The student, on the good mark, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the subject matter and the basic skills for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
	4,5	The student, on the good grade plus, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the key subject of the subject and the possibilities and abilities for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
	5,0	The student, on the very good note, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of subject matter and the possibilities and the ability to use the acquired knowledge and skills in the future.